When one builds up enough magnetic energy( electrodynamic in form) one discharges usually to some conductor or item/ object which has less magnetic energy in this form . We know that modern materials through dynamic frequency variation in the I herent and ambient magnetic patterning can build up high voltage fields in certain people , objects but has anyone ever known of a discharge to a plant, Tree or wooden object perse?

The foundational principle of magnetic behaviour : expansion and contraction if materiality through rotational dynamics. The cause of that rotation is an explosive or implosive power or pressure. This pressure is universally and non constantly dynamic and complex, but as a first approximation to describing its behaviour trochoidally dynamic surfaces are used to model its dynamics. The use of a circular arc vector, or a spherical vector surface , or a sphere vector volume by means of exponential Quaternion Fouruer series provides a launch pad for further investimations .

Now I consider the transformer. An inductor/ conductor carries a pair of rotational dynamics along its length, bouncing back at an impedance change, and superposition ing to form a standing rotation at a given frequency. This inductor is then looped n times around an iron core . This results in an intensification in the amplitude of the standing rotation , but the number of rotations around the iron core also increase the frequency of the induced rotational dynamic around the iron core, and promote a MASING effect within the core intensifying by resonance the standing rotation about and within the entire core. This dynamic Ed calls a magnetic current within the core, and it is also a pair of interacting rotational dynamics.

The MASING effect we perceive as a magnetic pressure with 2 polarities in a double layer . However when the core is a loop we perceive a confined magnetic flux / current within the core loop which has an amplitude and frequency proportional to the number of loops of the initiating inductor/ conductor.

We now introduce a second inductor/ conductor into this rotational dynamic. The inductor is induced by the standing rotational dynamic to carry a rotational dynamic itself, and the amplitude and frequency of that dynamic is proportional to the number of loops of this second inductor/ conductor within the establishing rotational dynamic. Thus the frequency and amplitude of the rotational dynamic may be " stepped up or down" by the integer number if loops, which gives a quantised proportionality to the inducing and induced rotationa dynamics, supported by MASING within the core materiality, but inherent with the conductor/inductor material itself.

We measure this step in terms of voltage which relates charge to induction by a rotational dynamic of a given frequency and amplitude.

Thus charge within a material induced by tribology is related to frequency and amplitude of this tribological disturbance. That is a magnetic behaviour or rotational dynamic induces voltage and charge into materiality by charge separation or producing a double layer. The double layer is created by a separating displacement over a short time span the time span required is dependent on the frequency of the established rotational dynamic. The higher the frequency the faster the separation has to occur to establish a double layer.

Thus high frequency rotational dynamics inherently will create a higher voltage charge layer, but that voltage may be of a very small amplitude, and thus the rotational dynamic will give a low or minuscule amperage reading.

If however that rotational dynamic is allowed or able to develop by MASING a huge amplitude within a material that amplitude will give a high amperage reading.

It is the MASING effect within materials which is potentially dangerous as the resonance builds the amplitude by constructive coherent interference.

Thus charge would in this model represent an amplitude and frequency proportional effect of a magnetic current established by charge separation of a double layer, this being the two ends where an impedance mismatch causes a reflection in the rotational dynamic to occur.

As the two ends of the reflecting rotational dynamic are moved apart the voltage between them is due to the local poles interacting with surrounding materiality in a way we call insular or implying insulation. The materiality around these poles creates an impedance interaction that supports one half of the originating dynamic, but a conductor/ conductor can reestablish that rotationa dynamic resulting in a decaying dynamic as the interference gradually cancels out each other in the absence of an external inducing source to maintain it.

Thus double layers are "entangled" in this way by the originating source, but once separated the poles can interact independently with their surrounding environment. Any conductor/ inductor linking a pole to a pole or region of lower voltage will act exactly like a double layer had been formed from these 2 regions or poles!

The point is that the effect we call charge and it's measure we call voltage are the isolated frequency and amplitude dynamic of a rotational dynamic which has paired by by a MASING effect two poles or regions of reflection where an impedance change is evident, and these poles are further able to be separated by impedance effects in materiality creating local " charge/ voltage" differences whic act like double layers within their regions.

The magnetic properties of water are demonstrated in the NMR theory and practice . That water us structured against a lighted surface is an aspect of magnetic patterning in materiality that was ignored until the EZ water research pioneered the necessary review. We know how sound can cymatic ally pattern water but until the advent of NMR warer was not thought of in a patterned way . Those patterns form a double layer at the impedance boundaries and thus a charge differential. The Leyden jar was found to store charge by accident., but now we know it is s structures pattern resulting from the action of magnetic patterning .

The principle of qi gong is to move qi throughout the body and pace naturally , however you do it. It is clear that natural means rotationlly , it is a significant characteristic of magnetic behaviour that it is inextricably rotational

Reading into this paper provides a lot of clarity if you are not baffled by symbolism or mathmythics. We perceive without any objective scales however we intuitively count and compare . As we count we arrange and sequence or we are forced to count an imposed sequence or arrangement. In this way our perceptions of the spaciometric dynamics around us are generating a counting and descriptive response . This is our root Logos. But on further inspection the Pythagorean school determined our logos is based on at least 2 dynamically varying perceptions or objects of study. Thus a logos is always a comparison or ratio . The ways of comparing logoi are set out in books 5 to 7 of the Stoikeia of Euclid.

So leaving the philosophical underpinnings till later, we see several observations and definitions established by comparison and counting. These deal with our perceptions of spaciometric dynamics. Thus objects relative to us or a reference idea move or remain still. When we interact with those objects we experience force of pushing or pulling at various frequencies amplitudes and phases. The effect on us reveals how saciometrically stable we are. Some things move us other things we move., some things vibrate us other things we vibrate etc. all of these can be considered generally as trochoidal displacements.

Measures of our kinaesthetic / proprioceptive response to our instability we tend to call vis or as translated force. However pressure is what is meant by vis and it is a historical fact that measures of pressure really only became clearly distinguished after the general idea of gravitational force was accepted under Newtons influence. So our concept of pressure became limited by force instead of pressure determining the nature of force. The nature of force is trochoidal , we see this in any pressure system we care to observe. Historically magnetism as a subject came before Newton, but when Newtons ideas were accepted magnetism was demoted. In a similar way when the electric spark came along reliably, magnetic behaviour was further demoted. It was Ōrsted and Ampère who lifted magnetism back up to its primary place, but only in the guise of an electric phenomenon .

In reality all spaciometric behaviours if a dynamic nature can be derived as a firm of magnetic behaviour dependent on phase, frequency and amplitude of complex arrangements of rotational dynamics in comparative situations. You can count on that!

The zeroth law of thermodynmics introduces the concept of therml equilibrium. It is this thermal equilibrium that obscures the connection while implying the connection to magnetic behaviour. Firstly equilibrium is n observed phenomenon which exists in the comparative assessment of an observer of several dynamic situations under purview. The nature of dynamics is rotational kinematics . Thus equilibrium is manifest in the absence of rotational variation in and across comparable situations. Where there is potential for rotation there we will observe magnetic behaviour.

The potential for rotation exists at many scales and at multiple frequencies and phases. Thus dynamic equilibrium is assesed at a convenient scale or amplitude of motion with frequency and phase usually ignored or assigned to thermocouple or electrical meter measurements.

So the concept of thermal equilibrium is an assumption of equilibrium at a scale and amplitude within the bodily confines of a material . This formally is established by dividing a body into small independently rotating regions called particles. The measure of this equilibrium is a thermometer of an expandable and contractable material or of a variable electrical charge flow about a thermocouple.

Thus the thermal equilibrium is revealed to be a steady rotational state within the body of the material which exhibits expansion consistent with this steady rotational dynamic. The magnetic patterning associated with this steady state changes both amplitude and frequency up to the curie point where the frequency becomes sufficiently high enough to remove the polarity distinction as the phase of the patterning spreads into a dynamic rotating magnetic field effect as explained by Tesla. In this state the fluctuations of the " simple " field are experienced as a vibrating pressure variation capable of generating high temperature shock/ burn effects in biological materiality or colour emission changes in metals as they approach a phase change point in their structural integrity.

The zeroth law thus expresses the magneto sono thermo electro complex nature of materiality only as thermal equilibrium, obscuring the rotationa dynamics expressed above due to a traditional ignorance of the nature of material state equilibrium.

http://www.brighthubengineering.com/manufacturing-technology/53682-what-is-a-thermocouple-how-thermocouple-works/ While the Seebeck, Peltier and Thompson effects of two dissimilar metal junctions in a circuit consisting in two junctions between those metals , giving a metal,sandwich pattern is noteworthy I have to point out that this is in fact the recorded and noted work of Volta . Because of academic shenanigans at his time his metal atmosphere theory was ignored in favour of Galvanos chemical interaction theory. The Tribomagnetic effect of different materials was mapped ot by Voltas electrical Studies. And as a result he formulated the moist junction of 2 dissimilar metals as the design for ontinuous electric charge production. He called this sandwich a cell , and a number of cells a battery. . However , he stated moisture was not necessary to generate the electric harge, the mere junction of the metal atmospheres was sufficient. . The moisture and dielectric properties of the material between the dissimilar metls enhanced charge separation by the ouble layer effect promoting a summation of potential difference at the battery poles, thus within the Voltaic cell the effective layering or sandwiching of double layers was obscured by a chemical model. In space we find these double layers everywhere in the plasma environment.

The plasma environment in space is a demonstrable magnetic dynamic.

Thus the thermo couple junctions replicate the ork Volta so carefully undertook . These junctions were again replicated in the development of the transistor devices. Which is hy the thermistor is a related device to the thermocouple.

It is these sandwich, double layer junction devices that replicate nd regulate the magnetic patterning found in all materiality and depicted as electric charge potentials rather thn magnetic / rotationl presdure dynamics at specific frequncy ranges , observable by amplitude and phase dymics.

Despite the complexity of its presentation, it is the theory of magnetic resonance that brings all the sciences together into some level of coherency . This is because it is fundamentally a Magnetic Unoverse.

For when you think this is not a Magnetic Universe . It is magnetic variability that truly explains electrification in a cause effect feedback loop. Welcome to rotational dynamics ! Cause effect feedback! Xxx

The "Laws of Gravity" are a general version of the "Laws of Condensation", and thus a precursor to the study of the " Laws of Density". The Laws of Density are far from Trivial, but the ratio of pressures acting radiallly toward the centre of symmetry of a large spheroidal mass or approximately spheroidal are well known and taking an abundant fluid compound as a unit of this pressure action provides a uniform materiality to quantify the effective action of this radial pressure as a densification measure. Thus assuming an internal body action called material pressure acting radially we can adduce a net radial pressure toward the large spheroidal " mass" centre of symmetry . Multiplying this assumed pressure per unit radial length by the volume of the material gives is a product that can be depicted as the pressure producted with the cross sectional area over which it is acting.

Concentrating only in this instance on the cross section orthogonal to the radial direction of the centre of symmetry of the spheroidal mass we can claim a pressure acting throughout a spheroidal surface segment is effectively a Force of gravity. . We do so simply by defining the total force of that area( contained within the original volume) acting through the centre of symmetry is equivalent to the product of this pressure in a unit lineal radial direction by the volume of the material

By proportions or ratio( logos) theory we obtain pressure as a force per unit area. But more importantly that the pressure per lineal direction is the density measure of a material . Thus the mass of a region is given by this density measure producted by the volume of that region . Of course we assume a centre of symmetry at which the pressure is assumed to act radially. This centre of symmetry is also yhr centre of mass, but may not be the centre of Gravity, as that centre lies on a radial line joining the object through its point of anchor to the centre of the larger spheroidal mass.

Thus as we express it, pressure causes condensation of matter , and we may call that a densification or attractive pressure . However there exists also an expansifying pressure not just in opposition but in dynamic rotational relationship with the condensing pressure.

The magnetic genesis of storms and other rotating structures is simply overlooked due to the prevailing electron concept. The spheroidal or torus structure of a dynamic magnetic domain is known and documented on the sun where the frequency of the material is outside our viewable range. At the poles of even a bar magnet the structural dynamic of the condensing pressure is vorticular, but complexly so . It is this condensing pressure that forces like poles apart as more and more condensate sums to a bigger volume.

The complexity of the rotations sum structurally by MASING to a larger coherent rotation , which is evertheless a fractal structure of smaller rotations.

Without this fractal structural summation the apparent attraction of like poles is difficult to apprehend in a otational dynamic, but at the level of pressure, the pressures nullify one another creating a summative null pressure, or if you can grasp the analogy: a vacuum . Here the vacuum is not of a material evacuation principally, but of a rotational dynamic within materiality. Where this occurs the zeroth law of thermodynamics would make the region a thermal equilibrium and the magneto dynamics would make it a lower "temperature " region than the poles.

Why emphasise the magnetic/ rotationl model? Because it leads to a profound simplification of explanation, even though the complexity of the structures synthesised is mind boggling. However, fractl spaciometric dynamics provides a computer based way of handling these immense complexities. Revealing the scale free similarity in form and dynamics

http://fundamentaljournals.org/ijfps/downloads/94_IJFPS_March_2016_1_3.pdf The cause of gravitational behaviour between objects is not known since ancient times. This is because it was deemed the purview of god. However Le Sage and Fatio proposed a fluid dynamic model of gravity in which the fluid was a hypothetical dynamic of invisible particles. In a somewhat gaseous kinetic motion as later clarified by Lord Kelvin. The idea was well worked out but not well accepted. In any case it did not remove the unavoidable action at a distance objection , but buried it deep within a complex of collisions or pressure interactions

Space was thought to be a medium of variable but such low resistance that motion was dissipated in a negligible manner. Eventually this medium was thought to be a vacuum and then erroneously entirely empty. In the past 80 years our views have dramatically changed to conform to the depictions of more careful observers, but not without the usual academic bloodshed over grants nd financial streams for " research" .

The relativistic theory of gravity has provided a unifying backdrop for the current battle lines. The theoretical battle is a geometrical one. Is space time a thing andnismit curved? Is Euclidean space a thing and is it lat or a-t ( acceleration - time) as Halton Arp playfully dubs it. http://fundamentaljournals.org/ijfps/downloads/94_IJFPS_March_2016_1_3.pdf

We can step out of ths confusing dogma fight and simply observe rotational dynamics does not need to have these academic artefacts. The reference frame we adopt is local and arbitrary and generally curvilineal.

Within such a freedom, rotationl dynamics includes all displacements in particular so called wave mechanics. Observation supports pressure as a generator or associate with all curvilineal force manifestations . The fact of condensing nd expanding pressure is ignored at the cost of theoretical confusion. The over simplification of rotational dynamics is just as fawed as the over complexification.

Within the study of Trochoids/ roulettes we ind appropriate models to apply in a rational and Fractal spaciometric dynamic.

So we can depict the fluid as particles, a la Newton, or as wave- particles a la De Broglie, or as a gentoo hydrodynamic continuous fluid in motion, however we represent it the general formulations of erasure are the same .

Pressure sums materialty in an expansive manner or sums to zero dynamic. Zero dynamic by its nature can not resist dynamic forces and so it is "moved " by dynamic forces. In so behaving, the space occupied by zero dynamic is filled with dynamic space , but that dynamic space may be a denser more resistive materiality that alters the characteristics of a specified space. We may regard this as attractive behaviour between two dense material regions, or a dynamic condensation of similar materialty into the specified space pushed by the dynamics in the environment external to that specific space.

Without rotationa dynamics we can not um to zero in a space . A lineal dynamic can only sum to zero in a line or point. Summing to zero can then model spatially implosive activity. . Negative and positive "Energy" or work then sum expansively , but together they sum condensing energy density o zero , allowinnexpansive energies to push materiality into into that space or to condense materiality ino that space.

This is demonstrably fundamental bar magnet behaviour. But do not be misled by the over simplified explanations of the double layered structure in materiality nor blind to its potential to form dynamic pattern mixing at temperatures way above the curie point for metals!

Why when a double layer " collapses" and a region of zero dynamic is created do we get a "sunspot" flare event? The movement of the zero dynamic materiality occurs at a frequency and amplitude that is truly staggering! Fortunately for everyday bar magnets that emission is at an amplitude too low to affect our organic chemistry and a frequency to high for our eyes to perceive. We have to make do with the sonic out put of the interaction.

https://www.tue.nl/en/university/news-and-press/news/28-06-2017-world-first-new-polymer-goes-for-a-walk-when-illuminated/ This article reveals his fluid dynamics is really a study of rotationl dynamics with varying viscosity parameters. The polymer reveals what lineal geometry obscures, the general motion is saciometrically rotational in all materiality. That rotational motion is transmitted, reflected, refracted nd diffracted der dent on the viscosity of the rotating medium and surrounds is an observation o doomed by particle physics in the 17th century who gradually moved from a hard billiard bll to an elastic rubber like ball, to a biological corpuscle to model the fluidity in materiality.

That fluidity is rotationl in nature and indicative of magnetic pattern fluidity and motion, very much akin to Chladini structures in the fabric of the aether, only these are magnetic/ rotationl patterns of the aether .

## Comments

We know that modern materials through dynamic frequency variation in the I herent and ambient magnetic patterning can build up high voltage fields in certain people , objects but has anyone ever known of a discharge to a plant, Tree or wooden object perse?

Punching out from the sun. The small CME looks like a lightning bolt out into space.

The use of a circular arc vector, or a spherical vector surface , or a sphere vector volume by means of exponential Quaternion Fouruer series provides a launch pad for further investimations .

An inductor/ conductor carries a pair of rotational dynamics along its length, bouncing back at an impedance change, and superposition ing to form a standing rotation at a given frequency.

This inductor is then looped n times around an iron core . This results in an intensification in the amplitude of the standing rotation , but the number of rotations around the iron core also increase the frequency of the induced rotational dynamic around the iron core, and promote a MASING effect within the core intensifying by resonance the standing rotation about and within the entire core. This dynamic Ed calls a magnetic current within the core, and it is also a pair of interacting rotational dynamics.

The MASING effect we perceive as a magnetic pressure with 2 polarities in a double layer . However when the core is a loop we perceive a confined magnetic flux / current within the core loop which has an amplitude and frequency proportional to the number of loops of the initiating inductor/ conductor.

We now introduce a second inductor/ conductor into this rotational dynamic. The inductor is induced by the standing rotational dynamic to carry a rotational dynamic itself, and the amplitude and frequency of that dynamic is proportional to the number of loops of this second inductor/ conductor within the establishing rotational dynamic. Thus the frequency and amplitude of the rotational dynamic may be " stepped up or down" by the integer number if loops, which gives a quantised proportionality to the inducing and induced rotationa dynamics, supported by MASING within the core materiality, but inherent with the conductor/inductor material itself.

We measure this step in terms of voltage which relates charge to induction by a rotational dynamic of a given frequency and amplitude.

Thus charge within a material induced by tribology is related to frequency and amplitude of this tribological disturbance. That is a magnetic behaviour or rotational dynamic induces voltage and charge into materiality by charge separation or producing a double layer. The double layer is created by a separating displacement over a short time span the time span required is dependent on the frequency of the established rotational dynamic. The higher the frequency the faster the separation has to occur to establish a double layer.

Thus high frequency rotational dynamics inherently will create a higher voltage charge layer, but that voltage may be of a very small amplitude, and thus the rotational dynamic will give a low or minuscule amperage reading.

If however that rotational dynamic is allowed or able to develop by MASING a huge amplitude within a material that amplitude will give a high amperage reading.

It is the MASING effect within materials which is potentially dangerous as the resonance builds the amplitude by constructive coherent interference.

Thus charge would in this model represent an amplitude and frequency proportional effect of a magnetic current established by charge separation of a double layer, this being the two ends where an impedance mismatch causes a reflection in the rotational dynamic to occur.

As the two ends of the reflecting rotational dynamic are moved apart the voltage between them is due to the local poles interacting with surrounding materiality in a way we call insular or implying insulation. The materiality around these poles creates an impedance interaction that supports one half of the originating dynamic, but a conductor/ conductor can reestablish that rotationa dynamic resulting in a decaying dynamic as the interference gradually cancels out each other in the absence of an external inducing source to maintain it.

Thus double layers are "entangled" in this way by the originating source, but once separated the poles can interact independently with their surrounding environment.

Any conductor/ inductor linking a pole to a pole or region of lower voltage will act exactly like a double layer had been formed from these 2 regions or poles!

The point is that the effect we call charge and it's measure we call voltage are the isolated frequency and amplitude dynamic of a rotational dynamic which has paired by by a MASING effect two poles or regions of reflection where an impedance change is evident, and these poles are further able to be separated by impedance effects in materiality creating local " charge/ voltage" differences whic act like double layers within their regions.

The magnetic properties of water are demonstrated in the NMR theory and practice . That water us structured against a lighted surface is an aspect of magnetic patterning in materiality that was ignored until the EZ water research pioneered the necessary review.

We know how sound can cymatic ally pattern water but until the advent of NMR warer was not thought of in a patterned way . Those patterns form a double layer at the impedance boundaries and thus a charge differential.

The Leyden jar was found to store charge by accident., but now we know it is s structures pattern resulting from the action of magnetic patterning .

The principle of qi gong is to move qi throughout the body and pace naturally , however you do it.

It is clear that natural means rotationlly , it is a significant characteristic of magnetic behaviour that it is inextricably rotational

You can't escape magnetic behaviour ! Gravity where is your sting ?

Reading into this paper provides a lot of clarity if you are not baffled by symbolism or mathmythics.

We perceive without any objective scales however we intuitively count and compare . As we count we arrange and sequence or we are forced to count an imposed sequence or arrangement. In this way our perceptions of the spaciometric dynamics around us are generating a counting and descriptive response .

This is our root Logos.

But on further inspection the Pythagorean school determined our logos is based on at least 2 dynamically varying perceptions or objects of study. Thus a logos is always a comparison or ratio .

The ways of comparing logoi are set out in books 5 to 7 of the Stoikeia of Euclid.

So leaving the philosophical underpinnings till later, we see several observations and definitions established by comparison and counting. These deal with our perceptions of spaciometric dynamics. Thus objects relative to us or a reference idea move or remain still. When we interact with those objects we experience force of pushing or pulling at various frequencies amplitudes and phases. The effect on us reveals how saciometrically stable we are. Some things move us other things we move., some things vibrate us other things we vibrate etc. all of these can be considered generally as trochoidal displacements.

Measures of our kinaesthetic / proprioceptive response to our instability we tend to call vis or as translated force. However pressure is what is meant by vis and it is a historical fact that measures of pressure really only became clearly distinguished after the general idea of gravitational force was accepted under Newtons influence. So our concept of pressure became limited by force instead of pressure determining the nature of force.

The nature of force is trochoidal , we see this in any pressure system we care to observe.

Historically magnetism as a subject came before Newton, but when Newtons ideas were accepted magnetism was demoted. In a similar way when the electric spark came along reliably, magnetic behaviour was further demoted.

It was Ōrsted and Ampère who lifted magnetism back up to its primary place, but only in the guise of an electric phenomenon .

In reality all spaciometric behaviours if a dynamic nature can be derived as a firm of magnetic behaviour dependent on phase, frequency and amplitude of complex arrangements of rotational dynamics in comparative situations.

You can count on that!

The zeroth law of thermodynmics introduces the concept of therml equilibrium. It is this thermal equilibrium that obscures the connection while implying the connection to magnetic behaviour.

Firstly equilibrium is n observed phenomenon which exists in the comparative assessment of an observer of several dynamic situations under purview.

The nature of dynamics is rotational kinematics . Thus equilibrium is manifest in the absence of rotational variation in and across comparable situations.

Where there is potential for rotation there we will observe magnetic behaviour.

The potential for rotation exists at many scales and at multiple frequencies and phases. Thus dynamic equilibrium is assesed at a convenient scale or amplitude of motion with frequency and phase usually ignored or assigned to thermocouple or electrical meter measurements.

So the concept of thermal equilibrium is an assumption of equilibrium at a scale and amplitude within the bodily confines of a material . This formally is established by dividing a body into small independently rotating regions called particles.

The measure of this equilibrium is a thermometer of an expandable and contractable material or of a variable electrical charge flow about a thermocouple.

Thus the thermal equilibrium is revealed to be a steady rotational state within the body of the material which exhibits expansion consistent with this steady rotational dynamic.

The magnetic patterning associated with this steady state changes both amplitude and frequency up to the curie point where the frequency becomes sufficiently high enough to remove the polarity distinction as the phase of the patterning spreads into a dynamic rotating magnetic field effect as explained by Tesla. In this state the fluctuations of the " simple " field are experienced as a vibrating pressure variation capable of generating high temperature shock/ burn effects in biological materiality or colour emission changes in metals as they approach a phase change point in their structural integrity.

The zeroth law thus expresses the magneto sono thermo electro complex nature of materiality only as thermal equilibrium, obscuring the rotationa dynamics expressed above due to a traditional ignorance of the nature of material state equilibrium.

http://www.brighthubengineering.com/manufacturing-technology/53682-what-is-a-thermocouple-how-thermocouple-works/

While the Seebeck, Peltier and Thompson effects of two dissimilar metal junctions in a circuit consisting in two junctions between those metals , giving a metal,sandwich pattern is noteworthy I have to point out that this is in fact the recorded and noted work of Volta . Because of academic shenanigans at his time his metal atmosphere theory was ignored in favour of Galvanos chemical interaction theory. The Tribomagnetic effect of different materials was mapped ot by Voltas electrical Studies. And as a result he formulated the moist junction of 2 dissimilar metals as the design for ontinuous electric charge production. He called this sandwich a cell , and a number of cells a battery. .

However , he stated moisture was not necessary to generate the electric harge, the mere junction of the metal atmospheres was sufficient. . The moisture and dielectric properties of the material between the dissimilar metls enhanced charge separation by the ouble layer effect promoting a summation of potential difference at the battery poles, thus within the Voltaic cell the effective layering or sandwiching of double layers was obscured by a chemical model. In space we find these double layers everywhere in the plasma environment.

The plasma environment in space is a demonstrable magnetic dynamic.

Thus the thermo couple junctions replicate the ork Volta so carefully undertook . These junctions were again replicated in the development of the transistor devices. Which is hy the thermistor is a related device to the thermocouple.

It is these sandwich, double layer junction devices that replicate nd regulate the magnetic patterning found in all materiality and depicted as electric charge potentials rather thn magnetic / rotationl presdure dynamics at specific frequncy ranges , observable by amplitude and phase dymics.

Despite the complexity of its presentation, it is the theory of magnetic resonance that brings all the sciences together into some level of coherency .

This is because it is fundamentally a Magnetic Unoverse.

For when you think this is not a Magnetic Universe . It is magnetic variability that truly explains electrification in a cause effect feedback loop.

Welcome to rotational dynamics ! Cause effect feedback! Xxx

The Laws of Density are far from Trivial, but the ratio of pressures acting radiallly toward the centre of symmetry of a large spheroidal mass or approximately spheroidal are well known and taking an abundant fluid compound as a unit of this pressure action provides a uniform materiality to quantify the effective action of this radial pressure as a densification measure.

Thus assuming an internal body action called material pressure acting radially we can adduce a net radial pressure toward the large spheroidal " mass" centre of symmetry . Multiplying this assumed pressure per unit radial length by the volume of the material gives is a product that can be depicted as the pressure producted with the cross sectional area over which it is acting.

Concentrating only in this instance on the cross section orthogonal to the radial direction of the centre of symmetry of the spheroidal mass we can claim a pressure acting throughout a spheroidal surface segment is effectively a Force of gravity. . We do so simply by defining the total force of that area( contained within the original volume) acting through the centre of symmetry is equivalent to the product of this pressure in a unit lineal radial direction by the volume of the material

By proportions or ratio( logos) theory we obtain pressure as a force per unit area. But more importantly that the pressure per lineal direction is the density measure of a material . Thus the mass of a region is given by this density measure producted by the volume of that region .

Of course we assume a centre of symmetry at which the pressure is assumed to act radially. This centre of symmetry is also yhr centre of mass, but may not be the centre of Gravity, as that centre lies on a radial line joining the object through its point of anchor to the centre of the larger spheroidal mass.

Thus as we express it, pressure causes condensation of matter , and we may call that a densification or attractive pressure . However there exists also an expansifying pressure not just in opposition but in dynamic rotational relationship with the condensing pressure.

The magnetic genesis of storms and other rotating structures is simply overlooked due to the prevailing electron concept. The spheroidal or torus structure of a dynamic magnetic domain is known and documented on the sun where the frequency of the material is outside our viewable range. At the poles of even a bar magnet the structural dynamic of the condensing pressure is vorticular, but complexly so . It is this condensing pressure that forces like poles apart as more and more condensate sums to a bigger volume.

The complexity of the rotations sum structurally by MASING to a larger coherent rotation , which is evertheless a fractal structure of smaller rotations.

Without this fractal structural summation the apparent attraction of like poles is difficult to apprehend in a otational dynamic, but at the level of pressure, the pressures nullify one another creating a summative null pressure, or if you can grasp the analogy: a vacuum . Here the vacuum is not of a material evacuation principally, but of a rotational dynamic within materiality. Where this occurs the zeroth law of thermodynamics would make the region a thermal equilibrium and the magneto dynamics would make it a lower "temperature " region than the poles.

Why emphasise the magnetic/ rotationl model? Because it leads to a profound simplification of explanation, even though the complexity of the structures synthesised is mind boggling.

However, fractl spaciometric dynamics provides a computer based way of handling these immense complexities. Revealing the scale free similarity in form and dynamics

The cause of gravitational behaviour between objects is not known since ancient times. This is because it was deemed the purview of god.

However Le Sage and Fatio proposed a fluid dynamic model of gravity in which the fluid was a hypothetical dynamic of invisible particles. In a somewhat gaseous kinetic motion as later clarified by Lord Kelvin.

The idea was well worked out but not well accepted. In any case it did not remove the unavoidable action at a distance objection , but buried it deep within a complex of collisions or pressure interactions

Space was thought to be a medium of variable but such low resistance that motion was dissipated in a negligible manner. Eventually this medium was thought to be a vacuum and then erroneously entirely empty.

In the past 80 years our views have dramatically changed to conform to the depictions of more careful observers, but not without the usual academic bloodshed over grants nd financial streams for " research" .

The relativistic theory of gravity has provided a unifying backdrop for the current battle lines. The theoretical battle is a geometrical one. Is space time a thing andnismit curved? Is Euclidean space a thing and is it lat or a-t ( acceleration - time) as Halton Arp playfully dubs it.

http://fundamentaljournals.org/ijfps/downloads/94_IJFPS_March_2016_1_3.pdf

We can step out of ths confusing dogma fight and simply observe rotational dynamics does not need to have these academic artefacts. The reference frame we adopt is local and arbitrary and generally curvilineal.

Within such a freedom, rotationl dynamics includes all displacements in particular so called wave mechanics.

Observation supports pressure as a generator or associate with all curvilineal force manifestations .

The fact of condensing nd expanding pressure is ignored at the cost of theoretical confusion. The over simplification of rotational dynamics is just as fawed as the over complexification.

Within the study of Trochoids/ roulettes we ind appropriate models to apply in a rational and Fractal spaciometric dynamic.

So we can depict the fluid as particles, a la Newton, or as wave- particles a la De Broglie, or as a gentoo hydrodynamic continuous fluid in motion, however we represent it the general formulations of erasure are the same .

Pressure sums materialty in an expansive manner or sums to zero dynamic. Zero dynamic by its nature can not resist dynamic forces and so it is "moved " by dynamic forces. In so behaving, the space occupied by zero dynamic is filled with dynamic space , but that dynamic space may be a denser more resistive materiality that alters the characteristics of a specified space. We may regard this as attractive behaviour between two dense material regions, or a dynamic condensation of similar materialty into the specified space pushed by the dynamics in the environment external to that specific space.

Without rotationa dynamics we can not um to zero in a space . A lineal dynamic can only sum to zero in a line or point. Summing to zero can then model spatially implosive activity. . Negative and positive "Energy" or work then sum expansively , but together they sum condensing energy density o zero , allowinnexpansive energies to push materiality into into that space or to condense materiality ino that space.

This is demonstrably fundamental bar magnet behaviour. But do not be misled by the over simplified explanations of the double layered structure in materiality nor blind to its potential to form dynamic pattern mixing at temperatures way above the curie point for metals!

Why when a double layer " collapses" and a region of zero dynamic is created do we get a "sunspot" flare event?

The movement of the zero dynamic materiality occurs at a frequency and amplitude that is truly staggering! Fortunately for everyday bar magnets that emission is at an amplitude too low to affect our organic chemistry and a frequency to high for our eyes to perceive. We have to make do with the sonic out put of the interaction.

This article reveals his fluid dynamics is really a study of rotationl dynamics with varying viscosity parameters. The polymer reveals what lineal geometry obscures, the general motion is saciometrically rotational in all materiality.

That rotational motion is transmitted, reflected, refracted nd diffracted der dent on the viscosity of the rotating medium and surrounds is an observation o doomed by particle physics in the 17th century who gradually moved from a hard billiard bll to an elastic rubber like ball, to a biological corpuscle to model the fluidity in materiality.

That fluidity is rotationl in nature and indicative of magnetic pattern fluidity and motion, very much akin to Chladini structures in the fabric of the aether, only these are magnetic/ rotationl patterns of the aether .