Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

A sound basis to Rotational Dynamics

1242526272830»

Comments

  • The Stern Gerlack experiment is a magnetic diffraction experiment. However light diffraction is usually explained using a sine oscillation and angle of path length of propagation . It is not explained that the consequential interaction occurs at the slit or sharp edge,and merely projects or propagates to the screen of observation. . Instead of using path length to determine angle we should point out the phase of the interacting light determines the interaction result. . That phase is propagated radially and so the interference pattern is projected radially. . The question of dispersion now becomes clear. How does a specific phase interaction become visible only at a specific angle from the slit, edge or collimator?

    We reimburse extigate refrCtion, in which certain frequencies are spread or dispersed, not by path le goth but by frequency . Newton surmised a md Hank al attraction that was the cause of refraction at a boundary , an attraction that varied with frequency or corpuscle “kind”. Fresnel simply showed that wavelength and path length accounted for the angle precisely. . Later models related slit spacing to maxima and minima of diffracted intensities precisely.. thesingle split interference pattern therefore became a mystery..

    Understand that if we start with an interference pattern as a fundamental primitive, then interference patterns will interact to give : another interference pattern!

    So let us realise that the single split or sharp edge is a fundamental normal behaviour for any motion near a sharp boundary or between 2 boundaries forming a slit. This behaviour may be viewed mechanically as scattering or as force interactions on dynamic behaviour.
    So let’s u deerstalker dsilver is diamagnetic. It therefore has to be ionised according to current electron theory to become magnetic. It is ionized and a large cation of silver is accelerated through an electric field and the scattered io s are collimated into a beam. Those ions are assumed to be little magnets. They are assumed to be paramagnetic. But silver is diamagnetic so it would be better to see the results of the experiment.

    The results show that silver becomes paramagnetic and diamagnetic in2 species. . These came to be called spin up and spin down. This makes perfect sense. The ion goes one way or the other depending on its magnetic orientTion when it enters the deflector. Also it goes one way or the other dependent on its diamagnetic orientation.

    We know diamagnetic forces are usually weak so we might expect a diamagnetic particle to pass through only slightly deflected..

    Did the experimenters look for the diamagnetic response?

    In any case they looked for the paramagnetic response and were surprised to see the beam split.

    We can explain the results easily assuming parMagnetism, and the experiment shows silver becomes a magnetic dipole when ionized and accelerated . The orientation of the dipole is called its spin, but that is confused with a charge spin supposedly creating, generating magnetic polarity. We do not need this level of explanation if we do not introduce an electron concept into what can well be described Ed as a magnetic behaviour and phenomenon.

    In this explanation she misses out diamagnetism and the field alignment torque The alignment occurs on the fempto second scale at this size but any imbalance paramagnetic will favour one side or the other while diamagnetic will always favour the weaker side.

    So rather than messing about with all this quantum lore let’s just stick to magnets and poles and see how Howard Johnson’s analysis of a magnet into a double dipole structure with vortex spins affects our research in spintronics.

    The magnetic crosstalk between material seeking to bo d is something Ivor Catt discusses in his fast logic chip design manual and the Wakefield experiment on capacitators.


  • We see people making some version of Howard Johnson’s permanent magnet motor applying his principles of assymetric fields and magnetic pulse intensity variation by geometry or topological design. You will find details in the Howard Johnson thread in the library.

    In this video the non linear interactions are pulsed by a gravitationally enhanced magnetic spring lever assembly. . Only part of Johnson’s principles are used, and symmetrical magnets are used assymetrically .

    The design of the magnetic pole and hence the magnetic material is crucial to understanding Johnson’s work, he does not use plain ferromagnetic , but rather enhanced magnetic materials in which the resulting fields are shaped. However he began his research with a cube of ferromagnetic material and looked at diamagnetic copper material when carrying a current around it due to ionisation of the copper material. .see the explanation of the Stern Gerlack experiment in the Library. .

    He confirms Ed’s simple experiment demonstrating 2 magnetic currents as opposing spin vortices, but as yet I have found no clear demonstration of the PMH magnetic current.
  • We now know that in ferromagnetic material the domain walls exhibit diamagnetism!

    This maybe due to the strong vortices impeding each other at their outer limbs or due to diamagnetic material doping in the ferromagnetic material as impurities. Nevertheless these boundaries are morphable at room temperatures indicating that the ionic substructure in the crystalline structure may be viscoelestic !

    Because the magnetic force is 10^39 times more powerful we should expect that simply rubbing a surface will have dramatically greater effect than gravity!

    Tribomagnetism therefore plays a much greater part in our everyday experience of pressure than we realise, and these weak diamagnetic forces may in fact be what we experience as gravity .

    When Eric Laitnwaite drew attention to the effect of spin in a gravity magneto field his colleagues sought to decry his investigations. The wholly mechanical explanation of Gyroscopy, without recourse to Aragon’s disc experiment and the homopolar motor behaviour is of course now ludicrous to entertain!
    Modern Spintronics is a way to change everything into a magnetic Universe
  • So I have spent some considerable time researching Howard Johnson’s discovery. It is not possible to deduce his theory because he has none, making his discovery hostage to fortune.
    However it provides me with some relevant data and insight regarding my own general theory , focussing it on the permanent magnet specifically at this time and maybe the magnetic current around a wire later. In regards to a gyre model I am lead to utilise a rhomboid as a pattern to describe the vortex primitives that are measured in double structure at each pole . I also need to highlight Helmholtz 3 theorems for rotational kinematic..
Sign In or Register to comment.