Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Powered by leedskalnin.com & buzzdev.net
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
And a force is an expression of pressure , acting on and through a and in a surface. It is this qualitative action of pressure which we call Induction . This pressure transfers into and out of a body where at a surface impedance constraints characterise its expressed behaviour int repulsive/ expansive or attractive/ contractive or neutral equilibrium dynamics.
The use of spheres belies the attendant rotational dynamic. . The assumption of a spiral is important to generalise the circular arc, but the resultant is a trochoidal pattern that is dynamic. Corpuscles of matter are a convenient model of regional impedance conditions , but generally the sphere is ignored as a contributor to dynamic patterns. The Boscovich model of the atom was ignored.
By using Terry Gintz Quasz factal generator app I will demonstrate how a trochoidally dynamic pattern of forces can sculpt a uniform aether/ materiality into patterns that are reminiscent of solid, liquid, gas and plasma states. Since these sculptures depend on patterned rotation I am able to ascribe a magnetic dipole dynamic to the formation of these patterns.
The project that shows how magnetic patterns of induction shape materiality at varying frequencies, and how the Bloch wall is dynamic in materiality at those frequencies.
The barmagnet is a magnetostatic representation of the magnetic dipole. . A rotationally dynamic dipole looks very different. In addition the Bloch wall is also dynamic and is not like stationary wall at all but rather like a kraal.
The interplay of curvilinear forces forms a kind of fence network around the dipole sources which are moving relative to each other, and so the resulting mesh looks like a distorted sphere. This fear is in dynamic motion and is constantly changing shape. The sphere belies the actual observed dynamics with regard to a test piece . The test piece actually is move out by the curb and your forces so that it rotates in and out of the services funded by the networks. The traditional I am filing image is actually the test pieces poking in and out of the curvilinear force surfaces . . Certain frequency ratios between the poles Are needed to create these curvilinear force network surfaces .
The realisation of a magnetic universe is encouraging but misleading. . Firstly the realisations are static. . A dynamic realisation would look odd. For example the Bloch wall in these huge magnetic structures appear to be the spiralling galactic arms and centres. . But we know these galaxies combine to form new galactic structures which have all kinds of shapes. .
The so called Fermi bubbles are depicted as a kind of Z pinch structure , making a polarity appear on either side and yet there are star movements within these structures. .
The Prime elements by David La Point attempts to simplify this dynàmic by introducing bowl shaped magnetic emitters. , again the bowl shape obscures the rotationa
Dynamic which occurs in space giving rise to shape through the interaction of spherical / spheroidal dipoles of varying frequency and amplitude ,
Using circular arcs as primitive is only the beginning. . Spiral arcs may be a more direct way to model these dynamics
This flawed experiment is just used to confuse people! First of all a Boscovich particle is not addressed. In that case we identify curvilineal force vectors that generate a centre of pressure. In other words pressure expresses itself in curvilineal force vectors.
Curvilineal force vectors interact to form trochoidal surfaces they interact constructively and destructively.
So what is the so called electron? It is derived from a curvilineal structure as a helical plasma tube a magnetic Faraday tube., the tube has a certain frequency and amplitude. The frequency governs the interaction. Amplitude only makes things bigger or more powerful, shining the right frequency permits the interaction that allows the material to emit a glow. The glow of corse is emitted at a certain frequency because the frequency interaction decays to a more stable state . Radiation occurs in all materials as we know from NMR
Very simply the electrostatic induction and the magnetic induction are exactly the same in both the process of induction, the effect of induction, and the motion of the induction. There is a difference in the mode of the behaviour, which can be characterised by the frequency, the amplitude or the fee of the behaviour. So currently magnetic induction said to be 90° out of phase with electric induction. that is the defining difference between magnetic induction and electrostatic induction current theory. Although frequency amplitude is not ignored has given no great credit in terms of the basic fundamental behaviour of magnetic induction. it is very easy to make an argument that the change in phase, all the difference in Faye merely and mode of operation.
If we accept that magnetic induction has different modes of operation then we can include all Electro static induction under the heading magnetic induction
The invention of the electron was the biggest misdirection in the field.
The dipole however it is represented on model, is the fundamental experience or behaviour of magnetic induction
Have spent some time clearing my mind from many misleading ideas handed down to me by the existing Paradyne folder. starting with the primitive pressure I have then accepted that pressure demonstrates itself in spheroidal curvilinear force motion. Representing this motion by a circular arc vector it becomes possible to generalise curvilinear motion by a trochoidal arc. main primitive controls of the acquittal are are the sea the amplitude in the face of the curve and the new behaviour.
Using will Shanks retorted trochoid, unable to demonstrate how various dipoles combined to give various interesting regional pattern. the complexity of these patterns enabled us to represent both attractive and repulsive forces within the same type, as a result of gear like impulse action on other dipoles within the spatial region
Although thoroughly tubes are a theoretical model, we can also construct cradle by which support a tube like structure in and around the titles.
The video that demonstrates how these trochoidal gyres can interact to form planes and then various regional spaces which move in such a way as to our year because an impulsive behaviour or an attractive behaviour.
The plane figure which starts the video represents the propulsion mode of interacting dipoles. As you expand out from the pure centre of propulsion the dynamic propulsion becomes evident in the impulse motions within the trochoidal for
The simple dipole can take many forms depending on the frequency and dude and face. As you can see some of those forms are extremely coherent.
It is important to expect that the magnetic dipoles will be dynamic! It is because we have been lulled into thinking of the magnetic induction force is being static we do not appreciate the dynamic nature of the magnetic induction force and therefore held that contribute to what we call trick mode
Current theory once the electric Mo to be the fundamental cause of magnetic induction. Why in the past this was convenient because it tied in with the electro chemical reaction very nicely especially the closest club, is no longer sustainable in today's nuclear magnetic resonance day.
The issue of magnetic reconnection, where so-called magnetic field lines are supposed to reconnect in a different pattern. Has behind the misunderstanding about dynamic
Dynamic block wall is completely missing from any explanations of magnetic behaviour, and especially magnetic behaviour in space.
The dynamic block wall is what gives us the understanding but there is a double layer or a type face an actual to the magnetic behaviour in space, it is not surprising therefore that it is found in the electric motor behaviour in space.
Very simply the electrostatic induction and the magnetic induction are exactly the same in both the process of induction, the effect of induction, and the motion of the induction9. There is a difference in the mode of the behaviour, which can be characterised by the frequency, the amplitude or the Phase of the behaviour. So currently magnetic induction is said to be 90° out of phase with electric induction. That is the defining difference between magnetic induction and electrostatic induction in current theory. Although frequency and amplitude are not ignored they have been a given no great credit in terms of the basic fundamental behaviour of magnetic induction. It is very easy to make an argument that the changed and in phase, or the difference in frequency are merely a mode of operation. And If we accept that magnetic induction has different modes of operation then we can include all Electrostatic induction under the heading magnetic induction.
The invention of the electron was the biggest misdirection in the field.
And The dipole however it is represented or modelled, is the fundamental experience or behaviour of magnetic induction.
I Have spent some time clearing my mind from many misleading ideas handed down to me by the existing Paradigm for magnetic behaviour . She tarting with the primitive pressure Notion I have then accepted that pressure demonstrates itself in spheroidal curvilineal you force motion. Representing this motion by a circular arc vector, fit becomes possible to generalise curvilinear motion by a trochoidal arc. The main primitive controls of the model are are the Frequency, the amplitude , and the Phase of the curve , of the new behaviour.
Using will Shanks Trotorted trochoidapp I am able to demonstrate how various dipoles combine to give various interesting regional patterns. the complexity of these patterns enables us to represent both attractive and repulsive forces within the same dipole, as a result of gear like impulse action on other dipoles within the spatial region
Although Faraday tubes are a theoretical model, we can also construct a cradle by which support a tube like structure in and around the dipoles .
The video that demonstrates how these trochoidal gyres can interact to form planes and then various regional spaces which move in such a way as to cause an repulsive behaviour or an attractive behaviour.
The plane figure which starts the video represents the repulsion mode of interacting dipoles. As you expand out from the pure centre of repulsion, the dynamic repulsion becomes evident in the impulse motions within the trochoidal force.
The simple dipole can take many forms depending on the frequency and dude and face. As you can see some of those forms are extremely coherent.
It is important to expect that the magnetic dipoles will be dynamic! It is because we have been lulled into thinking of the magnetic induction force is being static we do not appreciate the dynamic nature of the magnetic induction force and therefore held that contribute to what we call trick mode
Current theory once the electric Mode to be the fundamental cause of magnetic induction. While in the past this was convenient because it tied in with the electro chemical reaction very nicely especially the Chlorine electrolysis, it is no longer sustainable in today's nuclear magnetic resonance Era.
The issue of magnetic reconnection, where so-called magnetic field lines are supposed to reconnect in a different pattern. Hides behind the misunderstanding about dynamic Magnetic behaviour, and Bloch walls in particular.
Dynamic Bloch wall is completely missing from any explanations of magnetic behaviour, and especially magnetic behaviour in space.
The dynamic Bloch wall is what gives us the understanding that there is a double layer or a type Of region where magnetic behaviour is anomalous to the expected magnetic behaviour in space, it is not surprising therefore that it is found in the electric 9mode behaviour in space.
Magnetic currents produce magnetic currents plus modified magnetic currents. For those not familiar with fractals, all the work of Benoit Mandelbrot , This statement is innocuous. However the recursion of this equation, the iteration this type of dependence, produces all the wonderful diverse forms and modes found within our universe .
This is what Benoit Mandelbrot called almost self similarity.
Thunder eggs are spheroidal , trochoidal
Here Norman lays out the rational trigonometric and algebraic way of dealing with curvature and rotation. This goes back to classical mathematics even as far back as Greek mathematicians.
However the concept of angles or more accurately corners goes back a long way to the Greeks were the word gnomon means a bended knee, a rotating Bend . Traditionally this was measured by the chord of a circular arc which intersect the bend limbs replacing the called by the circular arc length was probably due to work done by sir Roger Coates and by Euler. Angles as our are any problematic because the trigonometric tables are based on chord lengths. However as Norman points out the whole concept of length is problematic.
Curvilinear vectors exist, however, and should not be ignored because of these approximations. In particular, the general curvilinear lecture in its combinations should not be ignored, and the resulting spiral truck Lloyds trochoidsshould not be ignored.
Here Norman demonstrates the use of a circular arc protractor which sidesteps arc length and indeed any length notion, basing itself on unit vector concepts and their rational duplicates, so called multiplication.
Here Norman introduces the notion of general curvature using the quadrance and quadrea of chords and triangles enabling general curvilineal vectors to be described rationally and trigonometrically.
The half slope concept is the corner of a quadrilateral form made from radial vectors and tangent vectors to a circle, expressed by a rational parametrization . Hermann Grassmann decided upon a general Rhombus to do the same job, following his Father Justus idea of using rectangles and squares. So Norman generalises it yet one stage further.
Curvilineal vectors are crucial to understanding and modelling the Boscovich Theory of Force, as an expression of a pressure region
It just dawned on me that I have not been taking into account the MASING effect in understanding my model dryer.
MASing would mean that a dipole would continue to expand as it interacted with other dipoles until it met an impedance boundary. At the Boundry the dipole would reverse its natural rotation, as a reflection. Consequently between the boundaries there would be a no dipole potential. That is a uniform magnetic inducting potential exist within the Boundry of the materiality
This means that where the dipole energy escapes across the impedance Boundry similar effects should be seen either polarity. Materiality in generality should repel however certain frequency regimes and phase regime result in screwlike or do you like patterns which may alter this general repulsing. The different reactions at the polarity when they are the same could be the result of pushing and pulling apart.
In any case the idea of electric currents in Space must be superseded by the understanding of magnetic currents in space. The notion of static magnetic dipoles is what is at fault here. There are no frozen in magnetic fields within plasma. It is the dynamic magnetic currents which interacts to form all plasmic materiality.
The magnetic universe starts with a dynamic aether we call empty space by ignorance! It is this rotational dynamic we apprehend as magnetic inducing force , arising from the regional pressure variations we observe by motion behaviour and proprioceptive signals within our psyche / or experiential continuum .
We select observable indicators to fashion our concepts by synthesis after analysing objects or regions of interest
Painfully presented, ut basically showing theoretical result of basing gravity on material charge of a dipole pair. This is the Walt Thornhillhypothesis in mathematical garb.
However the magnetic basis to materiàl charge is not revealed and the dipole being modelled by a trochoidal dy amic is still obscured.
We are getting there though. It is a Magnetic universe after all is said and done
Because it is the simplest and soundest basis on which to construct a more complex theory of everything .
Why is it magneto dynamics?
Because it is the soundest and most logical way to explain equilibrium, inertia, force . Gravity, electric charge and many many other observations.
Why is magnetic behaviour a rotational dynamic?
Because this model . And it is a model, is the simplest and soundest and most versatile way to describe observed magnetic behaviour, effects and complexities. At the end of the day the Pythagorean sunthemata, and sumbola is a theurgical dedication to the spheres .
I have posted on the magnetism of the ocean before. Here the ESA team make clear what they mean by the magnetism of the ocean.
They use the Paradigm of a dynamic molten core, assumed to be of iron, which is moving through a “magnetic field and generating a magnetic field by electric current. Leaving the magnetic field to one side, they assume that electrons moving in this chaotic way can generate a magnetic field which becomes coherent because they believe the core is in solid body rotation.
However none of this explanation makes any sense at all. In fact they have to invoke the magnetic moment of the electron, then insist that these magnetic moment become coherent, in order to explain the magnetism generated at the core.
It is so much simpler to start with a magnetic current which has inherent rotational dynamic.