Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Powered by leedskalnin.com & buzzdev.net
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
This technology allows us to see chemical reactions in a different manner. Most of us do not consider the speed or nature of a chemical reaction, nor reversible ones . Alcohol for example is produced in a reversible reaction.
The cyclical nature of reactions is illustrated in Zhabovtinsky type reactions.
So a chemical reaction has a frequency.
In a molar situation the speed of the reaction is dramatic, but so short lived we do not see the cyclical nature. However the sodium metal and water reaction is equally dramatic but there we see the reaction products sprayed out energetically in a cyclical process until the reaction completed.
Do not confuse the cyclicity with reversibility. The sodium can be recovered from the reaction products but it requires a catalytic set up to do so, as the energy released has to be put back in, one surface at a time!.
Nevertheless a frequency is involved in the speed of the reaction, and it is this frequency that provides many electrical effects from perturbation of the background magnetic status.
The magnetic oscillation we call light occurs across a band of frequencies. We see that oscillation absorbed( by destructive interference) and re transmitted (by constructive interference and surface translucency ) in some of these shots. The MASING effect of this interaction is also unrecognised due to the erstwhile speed/frequency of the reactions.
So the relevance is that whereas we are misdirected to view a battery as a chemical reaction, the probability is that chemical is a term for constructtive and destructive interference in material based trochoidal rotations or rather magnetic behaviours occurring at incredible frequencies.
MASING/LASING shows how these interactions can occur at all scales and at all energies and frequencies. The resultant products emit characteristic spectroscopic spectra as a consequence.
These frequency emissions perturb the ones established on the surface of a conductor/ inductor . Metals which are structured so as to oscillate well at given frequencies are correlated against electrical conductivity!!
A more detailed demonstration .
Note how blocking one mirror does not effect the light source only the Masing / LASING action . Thus any break in a circuit no matter how small affects the transmission of a MASED signal as if a mirror was placed to intervene in a circuit ,
Ivor Catt demonstrates how a pulse can be " trapped in between 2 switches that disconnect a part of a circuit from the " source": cell/ capacitor.
The implication is that the source traps or generates and traps such reciprocating pulses to release into an open circuit.
The nature of these pulses is clearly magnetic.
And what precisely was pointed on the anvil? Points like horns for microwaves provide a tapering " reflective " surface/ interface .
Was reminded of this thread and the concept of two currents after watching the gif linked below.
I am told it was Faraday who gave the ion description and explanation of what was called electrolysis . This of course disadvantaged any magnetic current explanation. The ions posited are now called plasmas and their wanderings called a current.
The rotation associated with this behaviour is downplayed and so the role of magnetrolysis is completely lost by " fashionable" terminology and chemical necessity.
Magnetolysis is responsible on the larger scale for the formation and rotation of planets around a metallic core in a system where a sun is at a higher angelic potential than the attendant metallic region within its plasma sphere!
The fluids in space are called plasmas and the Electric Universe theory points out the electical nature of the interactions, but point to a wire based circuitry rather than a " electrolytic " plasma based circuitry. However, starting from a magnetic basis makes magnetrolysis a natural and consistent depiction and explanation even at the solar system scale.
When considering magnetrolysis the notion of Eds 2 " individual magnets ", called north and south by him, but carefully distinguished as not magnets but the dynamic cause of magnetic behaviours at the poles of a bar magnet becomes clearer.
I have for the purpose of connecting the data sets associated these individual magnets with the two plasmas called ions by Faraday.
This depiction is of course based on an atomistic model. In such a model the plasma seen in Crookes Tube by Thompson was quickly atomised into the electron plasma or cathode ray by certain vested interests. These were Leo called beta rays by nuclear chemists.
The anode ray , the plasma visible usually around and behind the anode and often obscured by the cathode ray set up that squeezes the cathode plasma through a small hole in the anode was called the alpha ray by Nuclear chemists.
These plasmas not only pass through each other in space but do so in a way that a magnet can separate. These plasma " sparks "are rotational relativ to each other, but the Rotation is trochoidal.
The lysis or cutting by magnetrolyis therefore is perhaps better thought of as a separating of the 2 inherent plasma dynamics in materials, especially fluids, where the plasmas are less rarefied corporeally and visibly exhibit their dynamic. In a solid the Parma dynamic is sub visible rather than invisible and esoteric.
We can usefully characterise ths behaviour by a fluid dynamic analogy involving fluids of differing densities.
The latest research on magnetic behaviour in a magnetic current shows on plasma rotating inside the other plasma .
Now let's reinterpret the galvanic explanation!
The plasmas here as the individual magnets are guided by the conductor/ inductors( metal and fluid) asVolta painstakingly discovered . The rotation ignored in the above explanation is what is transferring the dynamic to the reactants creating the products. When the plasmas are thoroughly mixed a standing rotation is formed no longer able to induce a varying magnetic rotation . In this equilibrium status no " electric" behaviour is observable.
Whether the products are magnetic seems to be a function of the coherency of the products. Some reaction products are magnetic , some paramagnetic, some diamagnetic etc.
Note the belt equation .
Gyroscopic spin , "friction" , tensile stress , viscosity combine to produce this effect of action at a distance, or magnetic repulsion / attraction.
It is how you think of the observables that determines how you describe their cause.
We learn here how vortices are formed around specially designed aerofoils.
A wire is a specially twisted form although it looks smoothly extruded. These surface features encourage the formation of vortices around the wire in a connected circuit ., Because two opposing ortices are encouraged they are more stably interactional, although in direct current situations they do die out through dissipation.
Alternating current is far more efficient because the power is then transmissible by a rotating wave of filamentary vortices not just a simple vortex loop around the wire
The fluid involved is plasma , the Theoretical aether .
Impedance matching is like the lever action as demonstrated. When a sound rotation occurs a surface is created that propagates spheroidally. The radial pressure oscillates radially , a lower pressure surface propagates in fro t and behind to facilitate this combined radial motion.
At the same time a stretching rotational force exists in the surface. This tensile force diminishes with radius so the surface eventually breaks into regions of just radial variation. Ths is sound diffraction involving onlyn1 source.
Light diffraction using a sharp edge behaves similarly, but a single slit has 2 edges giving 2 sources for the diffraction pattern
The single Photon experiment gives similar results because photons are not particles but quanta of energy that is a rotational pressure surface as described for sound.
Harbour waves are depicted by Newton incorrectly. Huygens used circles to depict the hypothesised interactions of the spheroidal propagation . Newton assumed corpuscular interaction but merely recorded the spreading wave fro t in a harbour wave as short coherently matched line segments .while this image apparently matches the shadow casts of such waves in the lab the variation in shadow intensity is usually ignored. Of ourse with 2 sources this variation is unmissable!
The tendency to form filamentary propagation from an initial spheroidal propagation is due to the rotationl forces in the propagating surface weakening radially as viscosity in the medium no longer supports the tensile stretch ( surface tension) into a spheroidal form . Radial variation then dominates in filaments propagating in all directions.
Similarly agnetic B surfaces show this filamentary structure as vortices break away from the spheroidal pack.
The impedance is a measure of this rotational tensile viscosity especially in fluids( liquids and gases nd plasmas )
If we want to solve societies problems we need to collaborate, even though we don't know each-other on this site it's imperative information gets disseminated. I have been reading early 1900's Hawkins' electrical manuals to get smart on the subject. I honestly don't know whom ED L was but he did say to use as nature put it out. If you want to travel to another realm or lift excaliber out of a rock, it starts with the basics I think, Shellac, resin, beeswax, paraffin wax, wax paper, tar etc. Just as the Egyptians did. And use the Operating System of humanity, language, just ask nicely and things happen. Peace Out
The model assumes a spacetime or aether background that is trochoidal. Whereas it is good metrical practice to start with uniformity in order to establish observed differentiation measures, it is clear that spacetime is a dynamic substrate, otherwise it is of little use. As a dynamic aether we can not choose a straight line translation as uniformity, nor even a radial divergence , which is in any case non uniform. We could only choose concentric spheres as a regular but non uniform extensive description of space , but that can be shown to be equivalent to a fractal distribution of spheres at all scales distributed fractally in space by frequency and amplitude. This is in fact a Fourier model of a space time manifold which being dynamically fractally distributed is the equivalent of a trochoidal dynàmic for spatial and spacetime distribution of extension.
The quaternion Fourier transform is sufficient to model this type of fractal distribution.
However, our experience contains intensive magnitudes also , and through the Fourier transform for colour description , particularly the quaternion fouriermodel we can model I tensity and other intensive experiences..
Given this trochoidal background we can restrict our attention to phenomena that emerge out of the space-time / aether the most fu damental and universal , within the model constraints, being defined as magnetic / trochoidal rotation.
From this we may derive filamentary vortices that exist in extension in space- time which demonstrate directional and alternating power transmission.
We focus on these for this topic first from the satellite data collected regarding coronl magnetic field structures, in which it is observed that more I tense/ dense signals travel within broad filamentary loop signals in both rotationl directions in any identified loop. .
These more intense signals are identified as plastic material. Sometimes the ratio called the electron is emphasised in the description however the magnetic structure nd intensity is not denied nor given much effective standing in shaping the systems we observe, that strangely being given to some unobserved power called electricity.
The intense magnetic behaviour that passes as electricity is a simple theoretical blinder that has prevented a uniform view as proposed by Gilbert ever Bri g established.
We may now propose that these filamental loops extend far out spatially and concentrate p.asma at a point where we find a rotating p,an ratty body . Such filaments of magnetic vortices have bern called Birkland currents.
For each of the bodies in a star system these totati g current loops of magnetic vortices are sufficient to explain gravity, and in point of fact the electron or the ratio that bears that name enables us to simply replace mass in Newtons gravitational equation with an electron charge potential . Of course that then allows us to replace an electron description of the force of gravity by a magnetic ortex description.
While the description of electric force is an identical format to the gravitational one, electric force is on dived merely in terms of naked charge . Within a mass such a charge dipole would BR cloaked by a myriad of others. The net result we have called a neutral mass, but in fact we can use the electron to strip away that neutrality and see that the electric structure presupposed explains gravitational attraction. .
However this does not explain orbital motion. For that the electron ratio must give way to the fundamental magnetic filamentary behaviour Leary observed about a star as a " gravitational" or rather magnetic centre.
Attraction is thusly modelled not by simple action at a distance but by vorticular structures in dynamic link with mass/ electric/ magnetic plasmas .
If we now drop down to the scale of an electric circuit we see similar dynamics in evidence, with a battery taking a role as the power centre for driving the magnetic vortices already formed about material structures in the earths magnetic flux
Ken Wherlers ideas reward a closer look .