Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Magnetic current
Read first the interpretation of A book in every home
Key Takeaways from Leedskalnin’s Magnetic Current:
Electricity Comes from Magnetic Fields:
Leedskalnin emphasized that electricity is a result of the interaction between magnetic fields and magnetic currents, rather than the flow of electrons in wires. This is a departure from traditional electrical theory, where current is typically understood as the movement of electrons through conductors.
According to Leedskalnin, the magnetic field is the true source of electricity. When we observe an electric current in a conductor, it is the result of a magnetic field interacting with the conductor, rather than electrons moving through the wire. There is even a cool video about this here, made by Veritasium.
Magnetic Fields as the Source of Energy:
In his view, magnetic fields are the carriers of energy, and electrical energy is a form of magnetism. When a current flows, it’s simply the result of the movement of magnetic fields. This is conceptually aligned with the fact that electricity doesn't originate from electron flow, but rather from the manipulation of magnetic fields.
No Overunity or Free-Energy Claims:
Leedskalnin didn’t claim to have discovered overunity or free-energy devices. The energy used in his systems still comes from a source, in this case, the primary power supply. His work presents a new perspective on how electricity works, but it doesn’t violate the law of conservation of energy.
He simply theorized that magnetic fields could be manipulated to generate electricity. However, he didn't argue that you could generate more energy than was put into the system.
Magnetic Current is a Different Form of Energy:
Leedskalnin coined the term "magnetic current" to describe the flow of energy in magnetic fields. Magnetic current is the force that operates behind both electrical currents and magnetism, according to his theory. The current that flows through a wire when it's part of a magnetic field is a manifestation of magnetic current—a concept he thought was essential to understanding how electricity works.
Practical Application:
He used these concepts to build Coral Castle, which involved sophisticated manipulation of magnetic forces and fields, but again, these were not devices that produced free energy. They were based on known physics principles, but interpreted in a way that diverged from mainstream understanding. There is even a nice video how
Conclusion:
Leedskalnin’s work, including Magnetic Current, offers a fascinating and somewhat unconventional view of electricity and magnetism. His ideas are based on a reinterpretation of existing scientific principles, particularly the idea that electricity is more closely tied to magnetic fields than the conventional electron flow model suggests.
His work doesn't offer a free-energy device or any means of violating energy conservation. Instead, he provides a different framework for understanding electricity, where magnetic fields play the central role, and the energy transferred is still derived from a source. The energy meter would still register the power supplied by the primary source, as energy cannot be created from nothing.
Ultimately, while Leedskalnin’s ideas were intriguing and innovative, they were grounded in a reinterpretation of magnetism and electricity, not in creating something from nothing or bypassing the laws of physics.
Key Takeaways from Leedskalnin’s Magnetic Current:
Electricity Comes from Magnetic Fields:
Leedskalnin emphasized that electricity is a result of the interaction between magnetic fields and magnetic currents, rather than the flow of electrons in wires. This is a departure from traditional electrical theory, where current is typically understood as the movement of electrons through conductors.
According to Leedskalnin, the magnetic field is the true source of electricity. When we observe an electric current in a conductor, it is the result of a magnetic field interacting with the conductor, rather than electrons moving through the wire. There is even a cool video about this here, made by Veritasium.
Magnetic Fields as the Source of Energy:
In his view, magnetic fields are the carriers of energy, and electrical energy is a form of magnetism. When a current flows, it’s simply the result of the movement of magnetic fields. This is conceptually aligned with the fact that electricity doesn't originate from electron flow, but rather from the manipulation of magnetic fields.
No Overunity or Free-Energy Claims:
Leedskalnin didn’t claim to have discovered overunity or free-energy devices. The energy used in his systems still comes from a source, in this case, the primary power supply. His work presents a new perspective on how electricity works, but it doesn’t violate the law of conservation of energy.
He simply theorized that magnetic fields could be manipulated to generate electricity. However, he didn't argue that you could generate more energy than was put into the system.
Magnetic Current is a Different Form of Energy:
Leedskalnin coined the term "magnetic current" to describe the flow of energy in magnetic fields. Magnetic current is the force that operates behind both electrical currents and magnetism, according to his theory. The current that flows through a wire when it's part of a magnetic field is a manifestation of magnetic current—a concept he thought was essential to understanding how electricity works.
Practical Application:
He used these concepts to build Coral Castle, which involved sophisticated manipulation of magnetic forces and fields, but again, these were not devices that produced free energy. They were based on known physics principles, but interpreted in a way that diverged from mainstream understanding. There is even a nice video how
Conclusion:
Leedskalnin’s work, including Magnetic Current, offers a fascinating and somewhat unconventional view of electricity and magnetism. His ideas are based on a reinterpretation of existing scientific principles, particularly the idea that electricity is more closely tied to magnetic fields than the conventional electron flow model suggests.
His work doesn't offer a free-energy device or any means of violating energy conservation. Instead, he provides a different framework for understanding electricity, where magnetic fields play the central role, and the energy transferred is still derived from a source. The energy meter would still register the power supplied by the primary source, as energy cannot be created from nothing.
Ultimately, while Leedskalnin’s ideas were intriguing and innovative, they were grounded in a reinterpretation of magnetism and electricity, not in creating something from nothing or bypassing the laws of physics.
Powered by leedskalnin.com & buzzdev.net
Comments
Using PMH rigged with AC generator (strong producer):
Clockwise Winding (Hot Wire): One primary coil is connected to the hot (live) wire and wound in a clockwise direction.
Counterclockwise Winding (Neutral): The other primary coil is connected to the neutral wire and wound in a counterclockwise direction
These two generate magnetic field with the iron core.
Secondary Coil for Energy Extraction (weak producer):
To tap into the magnetic energy, you need a secondary coil (a smaller coil or wire loop) placed on the iron bar on the PMH This secondary coil will interact with the magnetic field generated by the primary coils. The secondary coil should be wound in the same direction as the clockwise-wound primary coil if you want the induced current in the secondary coil to have a similar polarity to the primary. If it's would otherwise, it will generate huge Lenz law effect to the primary coil.
Neutral Wire and Magnetic Return: The neutral wire is primarily involved in completing the electrical circuit, not in capturing the magnetic energy.
Rectify the current induced in the secondary coil using a full-wave rectifier to convert the AC induced current into DC. This will allow you to tap the energy that corresponds to the magnetic return.
So:
If you connect electricity meter before the AC source (which is connected to the the primary coils) and connect those to a load (TV, lightbulb, whatever working on AC) and then connect another load to the secondary coil (which gives you DC) on the bar on top of the PMH, you should observe the total energy drawn from both AC and DC load.
The secondary coil will only extract a fraction of the energy from the system based on how much magnetic flux is being induced into it.
The key takeaway is that energy cannot be created from nothing—it must come from the energy supplied by the AC source.
Based on the assumption that the energy from the secondary coil is derived from the magnetic field, and not directly from the AC source, you should not see any additional energy usage on the electricity meter. The AC source is supplying power to the primary load, and the secondary coil is just tapping into the magnetic energy that results from the current in the primary coils. The energy extracted in the secondary coil is not extra—it is part of the energy that was already supplied to the primary system in the form of magnetism.
However, practical considerations like inefficiencies and the possibility of reducing the magnetic field strength could cause a small change in the power consumption of the primary load (e.g., TV or lightbulb), which might be reflected on the meter.
If you see a significant increase in power usage from the AC source when the secondary coil is in operation, it could indicate that the system is not functioning ideally, and energy is being lost or the magnetic field is being disturbed, leading to inefficiencies in the power transfer.
In this case, electrical energy from the AC source is converted into magnetic energy in the primary coils, and a portion of this magnetic energy is then converted back into electrical energy in the secondary coil. No matter how efficient the setup, the energy output from the secondary coil will always be less than the energy input to the primary coil as extracting energy from a magnetic field—via a secondary coil or otherwise—induces a counter-effect (Lenz's Law). This counter-effect requires the source of the magnetic field to do additional work, increasing energy consumption. Leedskalnin's theories don't account for this opposition.
For example, if the AC source is providing 110W of power to the primary coil and the load takes 100W and the energy available in the magnetic field could be 10W (just an example). The meter reads 100W consumption. If you extract 10W from the magnetic field, you still need 110W from the AC source — the load on the primary coil remains the same, and the power meter continues to read 110W.
Reactive Power vs. Real Power: While the magnetic field stores reactive power (energy that oscillates between the field and the source), only real power (energy dissipated in a load) can be used to do useful work. Tapping the secondary coil converts some of the reactive power into real power, but this still requires the primary source to replenish the magnetic energy.
And you have to consider also the resistance in Wires, which leads to energy loss in the form of heat. and core losses, as energy is lost in the magnetic core due to hysteresis and eddy currents. These can be minimized of course.
This energy is not "free" in the sense that it doesn't violate the law of conservation of energy. The energy comes from the primary AC source, which is transformed into magnetic field and the secondary coil simply extracts a portion of it.
The funny thing here is, that if you read magnetic current, it says the exactly same thing. Leedskalnin did not generate any overunity device or free-energy device. He just stated that electricity comes from magnetic fields, not by "electrons" running in the wires.