Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Powered by leedskalnin.com & buzzdev.net
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
Your set up runs as a motor and a dynamo at the same time, which in itself is of interest, but it is not Eds best light machine. Do you plan to do any experimental construction of Eds best light machine?
Of course, as I understand it you will need to drive the machine by your motor.
Now for me the curiosity is the coils and their position in the electromagnetic PMH flux. The flywheel brings the coils in and out of the flux between the poles. Because the coil is circular/ cylindrical it should generate an alternating magnetic current evenly. Having a steel core should increase the power. Suppose you place 3 or 4 coils on a Y or X shaped flywheel as Ed suggests , how do you connect the wires to the commutator to draw out direct magnetic current? Do you need a split commutator if you want to draw out AC magnetic current?
The principle of operation is also not " cutting " the magnetic force or flux lines but rather filling the Coil core with magnetic flux and allowing the core to empty its magnetic flux into and around the coil circuit .
Great news! I am looking forward to your experiments and analysis .
Ed does not specify the flywheel, that is my own initiating idea. I was thinking of what you might find easiest to construct quickly and reliably before you get to the full flywheel concept. Ed just asks us to imagine his best light machine but also warns us not to build it!
The relation to Tesla is a moot point. Correct me if I am wrong, but Ed nowhere discusses the construction of a motor or the principles of a motor. This point dawned on me only recently, whereas Tesla's driving ambition was to construct a generator and a motor to use the AC output.
The principle of operation is made clear in the Imhotep videos, but I barely grasped it until I found an old instruction video on DC generator principles. The flux line cutting obscures the fact that movement of a disc through the flux generates a braking effect! The disc is " cutting" the supposed lines transversely to their supposed direction, but the armature is kept in the field and rotated. The 2 motions are orthogonal, but that is not important. Any movement in the field That fills or empties the core generates the effect we call current, loosely, but the best movement is the one Ed asks us to imagine. The question is why have we not utilised this design?
It assuredly occurs as the hall effect motor and sensor in our domestic meters but does it occur anywhere else? Is it the principle of Induction motors and generators that Tesla pioneered and developed? At this stage I refer to Arago's disc, which is the most fundamental experiment linking motor and generator principles just before Faraday extracted his mercury motor, and after Franklin devised his Electrostatic motor as illustrative principles.
If we step back to Eds principles we more naturally use a magnetic current base as an explanation rather than an " electric" one. Arago's disc is rotated in a weak compass magnetic field And an ever present geomagnetic field. The result is an induced coupling of the motion of the disc to a steady motion of the compass needle. Conversely a disc can be induced to rotate in a changing magnetic field, or if it is conducting a magnetic current about its form.
http://www.nidec.com/en-NA/technology/motor/basic/00028/
These observations link the observed motion of objects, including planets to this magnetic current phenomenon and interaction. Thus I think it is a good conjecture that all motion fundamentally is related to this magnetic current. Ed calls it a cosmic force, and I think there is much to be said in favour of that description
There are 2 details that I am only now beginning to appreciate in your design.
1. The AC is extracted without brushes or a commutator! This gives credence to Eds explanation of magnetic current as filling and passing into the coil through the core and vice versa.
2. The magnetic current loop in the core is maintained by positioning the magnets as you have, so that the plasmas move continuously through the core then through the magnets back to complete the loop. Whereas the iron keeper performed this closing of the loop role for the induced magnetic current, here the permanent magnets both induce the current and provide a closed loop. By moving the magnets as you do you provide a changing magnetic current that fills and exits the core in a manner akin to removing the keeper after starting the PMH!
Suppose now you set up each " flywheel" with alternating magnetic poles, so that NS alternated around each flywheel in contra position to SN on the second flywheel , keeping all the rest the same, would this generates bigger amplitude AC?
There are magnetic stability issues as well as core saturation issues I am sure, and maybe you have already found this out, but I would be interested to know.
Ok, I'm misunderstood you on that, Now I'm understanding what exactly your describing about the X and Y shape flywheel and in fact I have already made one. Here is a picture of a 6 pole shape flywheel and picture representation of how it functions.
Ed wrote do not make the machine I have patent in the patent office. What this machine exactly is, is hard to say, there are ten different machines to make magnetic currents to chose from. Now it's true that Ed nowhere discusses the construction of a motor or even the principles of a motor.But it's important to understand that Motor and Generators are both known as Dynamos. Now Ed is more focused about the generator where he gives reference to his most efficient machine. Ed also illustrates how his best machine is doing it by using one coil and one u shaped permanent magnet. I want to point put that the notion of flux lines being cut was developed through the understanding of using iron fillings as a medium of viewing the magnetic field. The faraday disk generator or homopolar generator does certainly repents this flux cutting notion well which also produces a DC electricity with the use of commutator and completely neglects the AC variant of electricity. Ed recognizes both methods of electricity.
Now I haven't tested the NS & SN magnet rotor pole arrangement opposed to the NN & SS magnet rotor pole arrangement I've been showing. To answer your question if this would generate bigger amplitude AC, I couldn't say exactly.I will certainly test this out later on. Sure the U core has some hysteresis to it but any other magnet stability issues are barley noticeable.
Lol! I thought you might already have done or thought of the idea!
Yet I still think that the modification I am imagining for the fly wheel involves coils on the ends of the flywheels not magnets. Then the PMH is used as a field magnet, or a number of PMH's are used to surround the flywheel with the coils so they pass between the prongs. Then the PMH's are activated as field magnets and the flywheel turned by a motor.
I imagine a commutator may be necessary to draw off the magnetic current from the flywheel, unless you can devise a transformer arrangement that has one coil spinning with the axle and the other stationary. You would also be able to draw off magnetic current in the way you have already demonstrated using the PMH circuits.
I am very interested in your work and ideas!
http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/p/Faraday disk dynamo
Very similar to a transformer but with a rotating armature and brush collectors.
An interesting site on Magnetic philosophy contains this section
http://www.phy6.org/earthmag/dynamos.htm
But the whole site is of interest.
The design for Eds best light machine would be some more complex version of these ideas , using the PMH and either a commutator or some other collecting arrangement. The copper disc would be replaced bya flywheel with copper coils with iron cores.
The battery that sets the PMH in field magnet mode might have to be isolated from Back magnetic current, which might also be " tapped" or brushed into the Msin output.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamo#
Although this is universally called Faradays disk, it was in fact first demonstrated by Arago, and excited much attention. Maxwell mentions this in his introduction to his electromagnetic theory.
Also I have another Magnetic device that is almost complete just need to figure out how to complete the Magnet Rotor and then the electrical experimenting on this can begin.
I do not believe you. You are reposting exactly the message on different threads asking for help but not responding to anyone elses reply.
You got your point across.
Anyone who wants to hear what you have to say, has read it by now.
The constant posting of the same thing is filling the forum with unnecessary reprints of the same long paragraph, within topics it interrupts and doesnt belong with.
You have recently started a thread with your name on it, perhaps you could keep to that thread.
Anyone interested has already expressed it, and I'm sure you can find them there if you simply post what you want.
You have created enough curiosity, and you've started above that you are a worthless drug addict, and you are beginning to act like an addict here as well. Your 'addiction' to asking for worthy helpers is beginning to affect posts around you, that were good before.
I can understand you are excited because you learned something, and thats fantastic, good for you. But the deluge of excitement and anxiety doesnt speak well for yourself.
Seriously, if this technology has existed for thousands of years, it will continue to exist without you pressing the issue like time is running out.
Again, you are doing alot of desperate talking for someone who has it all figured out...
First, if you can build the machine, which you claim, than you should find someone you trust with a camera, and film it, show some proof. EVERYONE has a cell phone now a days with a camera. I'm sure you know someone in your life, a friend or family member who has one, that you trust more than random strangers on the forum. First, get some proof, cause actions speak louder than words. And if you can prove it, your chances of being listened to will increase.
Second, if you know the 'secret', than you have the power, if you are so desperate about it 'not falling into the wrong hands' than keep it where it does the least damage, inside your mind.
The immature way you are going about seeking attention is insulting, especially without proof. You have created enough curiosity, that anyone will help or listen now, all you have to do is find a spot and stay there.
Youre sounding like a 5 year old with a secret, that just cant wait to tell everyone. Autism spectrum or not, it isn't speaking well of you.
I have a hard time believing you, because I've heard it all, and no one has shown a working model on video. Make a vid, or post a hundred posts saying you know the secret, one will speak bounds over the other.
There are better ways of going about this.
Why the desperation? Seriously? The ancient people knew the secret, and now if you do, it hasn't changed the flow of time, it hasn't brought the world closer to zero hour, and if you arent dying, than patience is your friend.
If youre being truthful, than make yourself a video. If youre not willing to do that, than back off. Theres more cell phones in the world than people now, I'm sure a random stranger from the street will be willing to help, as much as a random stranger from the forum will. And its easier to trust people you can see, I hope, rather than people on the net.
In short... You are going about this the wrong way. Your priorities are suspect, and the internet is FULL of liars. Theres never been a bigger collection of liars and exaggeration than here on the internet. We're tired of sifting through the shit rolling down the pile, looking for a diamond. If you have diamonds, stop painting them with shit, and show us the sparkle.
The repetition is bad etiquette. You've been heard by now. If you go about this in a better way, a more responsible way, you may be better received. I for one, have a hard time believing someone so scatterbrained and irresponsible in posting, could be so concerned for the fate of the world and have such a strong responsibility to do the right thing. You cant even do the right thing on the forum when looking for help, what makes me think you can do the right thing in regards to the fate of the universal energies of nature? And that you would care. Addicts don't hold back... and for such a self proclaimed addict, or concerned citizen, you are a contradiction, holding back in concern for the world, but not holding back on the seeking attention. Addicted to asking for help, please, please, but if you actually knew something and had a machine, a true addict would be addicted to that new machine, and not holding back on what it's limits of power were... cause power is the ultimate drug, and you sir, are not an addict, or don't actually possess that power in real life... perhaps just in the keyboard.
Thanx! i was just about to tell @taco1981 not to post it all over the place.
I had to delete some of those posts already. Sorry. That's how it is.
So here's a short summary of poughkeepsieblue's post: You've also created your own thread, so please continue on the topic there. If someone has to say something to it, he will answer there or will contact you directly.
If you will keep "hijacking" all other threads/topics, nobody in this (and any other) community will like that. We all remember ironshades who must have been banned in the end, no matter how hard we tried to help him and to teach him how to make correct forum posting. It's sad, but that's how it is.
Thanx everyone for understanding