Let's not forget: Pier Luigi Ighina

Gardener · February 2013

Gardener · February 2013

Jehovajah · February 2013

I make the mistake of Starting with a link, over and over! This really seems to mess up the spam software. Do you mind attaching the PDFs as resources , Martin.

Omg!

Poynting deducing from Maxwell, NOT phenomena

Let us not forget the Philosophical and scientific Soieties these pioneers worked to.

I have not completed my research, but it is clear that after Gilbert, magnetism enter a backwater as far as research was concerned. Electricity naturally was the exciting phenomenon. People like Weber and a few others (Arago's comes to mind), were just the rare researchers who liked magnetism.
Magnetism was and is fundamental to the progress of science, but it is ignored as An elementary phenomenon. Worse still, after Ampere and Oersted, it was treated as a secondary phenomenon of Electricity.

Whatever books Ed was researching he clearly noticed this obvious disconnect, and it's irrational fashionable basis. Faraday, despite his big up in the academic circles, did not fail to study the phenomena of magnetism. He studied Electric phenomenon too. In this way I find Maxwell has lead us down the path of dismissing the Phenomena of Magnetism summarily. In fact he starts with a elementary theory, similar to Lord Kelvins, and indeed a few other who proposed theories.

None, it seemed returned to reexamine Gilbert's treatise, or Boyles observations, or to give ground to Weber, an expert in his day on terrestrial magnetism used for nautical purposes. Weber , and the navy could indeed provide precise data on magnetic intensities, inclinations etc. but what they could not provide was a " spark" ! Had they been able to do so, they would have excited much interest, even as Arago did with his rotational magnetism.

Ed's theoretical model of 2 magnetic substances contra to each other is an obvious analysis of the phenomenon. What Ed manages to avoid is the +– mistaken dynamic introduced by Franklin. The 2 fluid theory, while not ideal is not superfluous as Franklin and. Maxwell conclude because Almost everything can be stated using +– . The point is what cannot be explained using +– is why likes repel!

We have sought to explain this but failed using +– whereas it falls out rather naturally using the 2 fluid/particle model with contra behaviours. This may seem odd to a scientist brought up and spoon fed on +– but in fact it highlights the delusional psychosis they are brought to endure as normal. Clearly there are no little +'s or –'s floating about in space with circles around them, and yet that is what is placed before us as theory!

Ed's explanation of 2 substances is elegant and sufficient, and really typifies a school of thought which can be traced back to Brahmagupta, and which , also, was misinterpreted by contemporaries of him.

Gardener · February 2013

attaching them...

Gardener · February 2013

next batch

Gardener · February 2013

last three

Jehovajah · February 2013

And now I have found a source for Howard Johnsons little book, which tells us so much, in addition, bearden asserts he was a neighbour of Ed Leedskalnin. Comparing the 2 documents may be revealing.

Jehovajah · March 2013

I was shocked this morning to read this concerning diamagnetism:

n. The phenomena exhibited by a class of substances which, when under the influence of magnetism and freely suspended, take a position with the longer axis at right angles to the magnetic lines of force. From the experiments of Faraday it appears to be clearly established that all matter is subject to the magnetic force as universally as it is to the gravitating force, arranging itself into two divisions, the paramagnetic and the diamagnetic. Among the former are iron, nickel, cobalt, palladium, titanium, and a few other substances; and among the latter are bismuth, antimony, cadmium, copper, gold, lead, mercury, silver, tin, zinc, and most solid, liquid, and gaseous substances. When a paramagnetic substance is suspended freely between the poles of a powerful horseshoe magnet, it points in a line from one pole to the other, which Faraday terms the axial line. On the other hand, when a diamagnetic substance is suspended in the same manner, it is repelled alike by both poles, and assumes an equatorial direction, or a direction at right angles to the axial line.
n. That branch of magnetism which treats of diamagnetic phenomena and diamagnetic bodies.

I Felt deprived of information from my youth up with regard to the true nature of magnetism.

This video dramatically illustrates diamagnetism

Gardener · March 2013

Thanx for nice post.

Check this one out!
Liquid oxygen attracted by magnet spheres:

In this video you can see two 8mm NdFeB N52 gold plated magnet spheres floating over a high temperature superconductor made of Yttrium-Barium-Copper-Oxide (YBCO). The superconductor was cooled down to -196°C with liquid nitrogen and is covered with ice and mist. To hold the magnet spheres absolutely upward an additional lifter magnet was used which is not visible in the images.
It can be observed that droplets of liquid oxygen, which is paramagnetic, are attracted by the magnet spheres and evaporate abruptly on the surface of the lower sphere. The liquid oxygen accumulated on the surface of the superconductor while experimenting and was not additionally added.
Furthermore you can see the mist vortexes which built up on the lower side of the magnet sphere. These vortexes consist mainly of water mist and evaporating nitrogen.
This experiment shows a complex combination of superconduction, paramagnetism, diamagnetism, magnetism, thermo-dynamics and fluid dynamics.

derekwillstar · June 2013

-

- 01:13 : solar energy and earth energy, combined together produce the matter !
- 02:03 : solar energy spirals down towards with dextrose, came into earth, comes out reversed (to the contrary)
- 02:47 : This is the so-called joke that the sun does to all scientists in the world, when scientists begin to will understand this, they will understand what the rhythm terrestrial solar

What are Clouds ?

Jehovajah · October 2013

I thought about starting a new thread, but then, no! Both Eric and Pier are researchers in magnetism as distinct from electricity. The distinction is important. There is a deeper harmony of these 2 behaviours but it is not Electromagnetism. It is a kind of gyroscope!

Gardener · October 2013

Amazing video! Thanx...

Gardener · November 2013

Anybody else except me can see the PMH there?

Jehovajah · November 2013

The generator seems to require an external rotating motor to drive it. I can't make out the Italian correctly yet but 200 cycle per second is mentioned. Now the rete seems to be a kind of capacitor or dielectric wrapped in a fine wire. The idea is to collect power from a monopole . The very principle of the PMH which uses the collapsing magnetic current/ dissipating magnetic current to return the power through a conducting energy guide to light a lamp.

Here the idea is to charge the PMH without its cap, notice, and then to discharge it briefly when the insulator comes round, then to charge again. The oscillating magnetic current( it is naturally oscillating, but it is getting a push in one direction by the battery) is being used to generate power in the Rete.

Now I have a thread specifically asking about charging a Leyden ar by a magnetic induction as opposed to an electric induction. This seems to be a set up that demonstrates that it is possible to do that dynamically.

I would be interested in a translation of the set up details and the problems mentioned therein.

By the way, I came to the conclusion that it was possible to charge a capacitor by magnetic induction, but only because I realised that magnetic and electric are misleading distinction of the same phenomenon.

derekwillstar · January 2014

Dear professor Laithwaite .... you're right: 1 main stream and another stream to balance (so gravity works!)

how can you get the primordial availability of this energy?
simple, doing what it already does this energy
and it is this that makes the machine monopolies pier luigi Ighina
can pierce the powerful counter-balance spinning vortex of gravity.
stopped magnetic monopoles and makes them available
clearly being primordial energy (life force) is dangerous as it can unbalance the normal balance is vital for anyone near

MarianPeter · May 2015

@Jehovajah
200 cycles per minute like 3,3 cycle per second

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

Let's not forget: Pier Luigi Ighina

Comments