Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Powered by leedskalnin.com & buzzdev.net
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Comments
Based on Saturdays theory we should understand lines of force to be as follows: a path indicating the least action of electrostatic or magnetic force in a medium as it acts upon the medium and whatever is in the medium ;
A path indicating the conduction of the lines of force through any medium with the deflection from the path which would be demonstrated in a vacuum indicating material interaction;
The lines of force indicate the preponderance of the conduction but do not indicate the only forces within any given volume.
In interaction with materiality the lines of force behave in two ways: either they compress or condense or contract together within material;
or they diverge expand and deflect from each other.
This interaction with Matic produces secondary forces which either aligned themselves with the lines of force or due to the nonuniformity of the field diverge from the lines of force. These secondary forces cause the behaviour that is called paramagnetism or diamagnetism .
Professor Tyneale showed The apparent formation of polls within a day of magnetic material, in particular Bismuth. These were polls induced within a business call by and electromagnetic coil, which in itself naturally forms a north and south pole expression ,These apparent poles are explainable in terms of Faradays lines of Force theory.
Now I do not know if faraday defined only one direction for his lines of force, or whether he envisioned lines of force emanating from both polls in opposing directions. It is quite clear that his theory works in both cases and with a combination of the two. It is these lines of force Howard Johnson‘s measurements, and putative theory have two equal will be better then. It is evident by faradays example that much research experimentation and philosophical attrition is required in order to establish a new theory of magnetic behaviours, and the meaning of any magnetic lines which are drawn. This scientists seem reluctant to do .
Let us see How Faradays intuition is twisted into a different theory by Mathematicians.
This simple introduction shows the chemical basis of Faradays intuition.
In his Day Coulomb and Cavendish established a polar coordinate or point formula for electrostatic force. Faraday saw lines of arrangement not force vectors. Yet Newton’s force vectors and his orthogonal resolution of them were standard physics by then, alongside His treatment of curvilineal vectors by resolving them to tangents and associated circles. , much harder to intuit than the rectangle of forces.
Mathematicians tried to demonstrate Faradays lines of force using the 2d plane and the rectangle of forces. Later Maxwell used Hamiltonian Quaternions to better fit these lines of force, thus giving a fundamental role to the mathesis of so called imaginary quantities. .
Lord Kelvin preferred the straight line vector approach Gibbs cobbled together from a poorly understood reading of the Method and system of the Grassmanns., combined with the interpolate day power of the Fourier Transform. Faradays intuitive and observable lines of force were lost in this mathematical complexity.
Finally Clifford combined the Hamilton and Grassmann descriptions by means of a presentation Hermann Grassmann wrote shortly before his death and introduced clearly the dot product and the cross product methods. Then he also died. Cayley then systematised the whole presentation using matrices.
Where were Faradays lines of Force?
Eventually a differential method called the source( or confusingly divergence) was associated with Faradays electrostatic sources for positive and negative charge. Unfortunately mathematical conventions meant that only one direction could be chosen, the other direction opposite had to be negative. We lost the sense of two lines of force. However orientation of the supposed direction of source force combined with the Grassmann more flexible parallelogram of resolution produced acceptable resultant vector resultant which taken as tangents to some curve enabled Faradays lines of force to be plotted out on a grid.
It was also found that a product method called the curl of a vector field enabled vectors to be oriented directly and to establish a curl vector sum of 0 as representing a closed loop with convergence and divergence as required by Faradays magnetic lines of force theory..
These mathematical complexities and nomenclature obscure Faradays intuitive representation, despite what mathematical Physicists might state about Clarification.
Here we see the source ( divergence) linked to the curl as causes of each other. However this is unphysical, as the curl has to pass through the material however small while the source has to arise and terminate at a boundary however small. It is therefore mathematically inherent that curl causes source at a boundary crossing. But Electrostatic lines are not “allowed to cross a boundary” and curl is not allowed to be nonzero, and so this description is unphysical, and we lose the power of Faradays lines of force to preponderate material either paramagnetically or diamagnetically..
The other aspect lost is the principle of least action so that the lines may be described as lines indeed surfaces of least Torque action on dipoles of any sort. For any really useful mathematical representation we need to study and develop Magneto hydro dynamics . This would provide a somewhat complex mathematical representation of Faradays lines of Force theory for all known forces, and be truly universal.
One is the Library of Gongress , the other is the University of Queensland library .
If anyone can gain access to a copy and share it here for research purposes I would be grateful.
The question is; what do the lines in Johnson’s publications refer to?
We are presented with contour maps and 3D representations of Data collected over a 90 minute measurement process in one plane parallel to NS axis of a cube and banana shaped magnet with enhanced polar regions.
We are invited to add a spin vortex around these contours and shown confusing pictures of double spin vortices measured in constructed magnetic arrangements.
We are shown a representation of attraction and repulsion measurements .
These are all strikingly different to Faradays lines of Force theory and no clear link is presented .
The difference between Faradays method and Johnson’s has not been fully explored, and I have made an initial foray only to find my scanty appreciation of Faradays Method and results are insufficient to the task.
Nevertheless, it is clear that our modern Field theory is inadequately fitted to Faradays observations because Mathematicians have finessed the issues with a particle theory , and an Einsteinian space time aether and the Dirac Quantum probability aether. Both of these are outgrowths from the Maxwellian luminiferous electric magnetic aether. However Maxwell like Faraday compared his aether model to a fluid dynamic but unlike Faraday he relied upon straight line forces rather than curvilinear manifestations of an in situ power in the vacuum
It is important to note that neither for Newton of Faraday was space ever empty, Space was a resistive medium for Newton, and a vacuum or evacuated region for Faraday, where whatever was in it was rarefied to the greatest achievable extent. Thus an aether for both of them was material and existed in a container called absolute space which by the term absolute contributed no properties whatsoever to anything in it.
I on the other hand accept space as a contributing fluid because I can not conceive of nothing
Well then, from the aether I understand that filaments and lines of action and differentiation form in the presence of a crystalline structure organic or inorganic in relation to other materiality in its environs. Indeed Faraday and others show how these lines penetrate and pass through the aethers and other materiality.. associated with these interactions and passages through are observable motions of the general translation and rotation nature where the translation is curvilinear. . We find the lines and thus the aether to be in continuous patterned flux, and it is the convergence / concentration orientation and direction that best predicts ponderous motion in line while the divergence best predicts such motion out of the line of action. This is so fluid like in terms of hydrostatic considerations that it makes an overwhelming case for a fluid analogy..
Given that how do we relate measurable pressures to dipole orientations of small or finely grated and powdered interacting materials?
The u.timate question is can we justifiably describe our measurement in these flat vortex spin arrangements based on these planar xy,XZ,yz measurements?
Let’s say that magnetic lines of force wrap themselves into trochoidal as they propagate in and through and being of space. What electric charge signal would be generated and what apparent mass centre would be generated?
One of the things people ignore about Einstein’s Tensor equations is the application to electrostatic and magnetostatic force law.. The constraint on geometrical topology adduced by these field modalities give geodesic for motion . Hence the saying mass tells space how to curve and space tells mass how to move..
When physicists rave about gravity waves it is in the face of the much more evident magnetic waves. Thus any so called gravity wave is without a doubt a magnetic wave mistaken for gravity, which to my knowledge , has never been established as a different force, just a very weak one in comparison. We can account for it by diamagnetic behaviour in a diverging magnetic field of Faraday tubes of magnetic force. If such tubes have these trochoidal dynamics in propagation.
Why space is cold and the sun is hot . Faraday lines of Force are in perpetual dynamism causing all the material phases, and elements.
Active materials.
Magnetic field lines are active
😂😂😂😂 tiny magnets. In other words magnetism is a fundamental primitive.
So why make electrons primary? They are not, quark magnets are primary in quantum field theory.. Dynamic quark magnets generate electrostatic, so called, charge. Faradays dynamic magnetic field lines generate Faradays electrostatic charge field lines.. if the charge is NOT static then the underlying magnetic field dynamic is revealed.
The revealing analogue relates to Howard Johnson’s description of a bar magnet . It is a magnetohydrodynamic object not a dielectric one per se.
So the topology of these dynamic fluxes is a vortex tube that is a closed loop . But now compare this to Howard Johnson’s designs..
Transverse flux motors hides the general principle of vortex rotation in a magnetic flux.
The principles of size mass and dynamics and surface area with cross sectional area. Note how diamagnetic behaviour and domain walls follow Faradays theory of magnetic flux lines tubes, surfaces and material characteristics.
The general theory put forward here is armchair. And so Anecdotal..
The introduction of terms like electrons and current in a conductor are misleading . Voltage , pressure and frequency and amplitude.
The magneto sono thermo electro complexes are now the focus of a new energy extraction and utilisation, the spaciometru being a torus, The materiality being plastic at all scales of length area and volume and viscous at all Reynolds numbers and dynamic at all temperatures and pressures, and Masing at all scales in all cavities. And it is indeed a vorticular trochoidal dynamic of all scales of rotation. This is not chaotic but “chaosic” or gas like, not disordered but self ordering and transmutationalby self ordering at all scales, not empty space but evacuated vacuum showing the fine structure of the medium we call material space, not only condensing but also evaporatively expanding . Not dark but light at so many frequencies and amplitudes, not memory but intelligent operating dynamic system self conscious of its fractal nature and intelligence.
It is not only omega, but Alpha, it is not only Annunaki served by Igigi but Igigi or rather YHWH over all and omnipoten Archon of All, who demonstrates the magnitude of its great Magnetic power and intelligence by a redemption of a human fleshy creation under the noses of and in the face of a proud spiritual creation which has accepted a lie and teaches its followers that same Lie.
The truth is that YHWH is the Igigi, sung of in the Tigi of old and in the Zamzam of old and arranged by Shulgi in the Cir-Gida to promote the Annunaki over the Face of YHWH.
He that has ears use them to listen:
For the first and the 15th day are appointed times to YHWH in the months found in the Torah, and the 7th day is an appointed time even in perpetuity. And which other than YHWH has entered into man to redeem and transform him from flesh?
My science is to reveal what is true and not to countenance what is not true, nor the lie that is called The Truth.
Volta could sense the plasma around materials particularly metals and proposed this atmospheric plasma interaction as the source of the electric potential and activity directly. He was ignored in favour of Galvanise alchemical explanation of it as a type of chemical reaction and thus a part of the growing powerful application of chemistry to everyday material use. Even Faraday developed the chemical explanation introducing the notion of an ion. These wandering particles were charged with familiar electrostatic properties, and the moving particles themselves were not seen as a p,as a, as yet, but solutes and fluids and transformations of phase : solid, liquid and Gas.
However magnetic behaviour was similar in behaviour but more elusive, and Faraday established a similar Tribimagnetic hierarchy of materials. It was only really possible through the agency of the electric spiral, because magnetic behaviour in materials not conducive to it were even more ephemeral. .
The point here is that a similar methodology lead to a similar table and directly to an atmosphere of plasma around and in all materials as Volta put forth.
The obscuring of the concept by chemical reaction was not possible and so materiality could not be explained by neutral particles carrying opposing charge, wandering in different viscous phases. Yet neither was it comprehended magnetically.
Faradays lines of Force theory and insistence on the Boscovich atom concept was not well understood in his time. But today we can understand his theory in terms of vortices of plasma whose very dynamic is what we experience as the magnetic action. The frequency of these vortices matches the intensity of these magnetic behaviours and there is a range of frequencies in all material we describe as electric. It is these we use to tap into and control the magnetic dynamic, but it is time to understand that it is the magnetic vorticular dynamic that is the universal primitive cosmic power and consciousness
And while a chemical model of the sun may make more sense than a gas bomb, the essential imminent power is the magneto dynamic plasmic activities that underpin the reactivity of the elements.
I have asked super magnet man if he can access Howard Johnson‘s book for me from the National library of Congress. His work here shows that he is the best man so far to be able to understand this pioneering work of Howard Johnson, about to continue it!