It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
If however I use the standard model I get confused, because it is confusing and mathematically obscured! The simplest explanation of curl and div as operators was related to these magnetic structures on the sun, by one professor, and I know Helmholtz felt these mathematical differential equations were a direct mathematical expression of natural dynamic situations.
Yes the moon rotates, but what descriptor one uses depends on which reference frame method one uses.
Rotation is so fundamental that Newton regarded it as an absolute behaviour
I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. - N. Tesla
' X finds gravitational waves in these conditions, but there is a suggestion that there is a mistake in the work.' ' Clearly any mistake generates gravitational waves.' p. 43
- What did you guys learn from that?- Location, location, location.
If we restrict ourselves to the kinematical aspect of the question whether the moon revolves around its axis or not, then the above answer is evidently correct because relativity of motion - all motion, including that of rotation - is a truism. Indeed, from kinematical point of view, the following two statements have the same degree of validity and legitimacy: (a) the sun revolves around the earth; (b) the earth revolves around the sun. Read more: A Sound Magnetic Base - The Atom Discussions on Magnetic Current Research
Ken is a hard listen, and not for the faint at heart.
I do not suppose you know what a Koan is?