Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

The Perpetual Motion Holder



  • edited February 12

    Here we see how current does not flow in a wire as is commonly taught. Instead it flows in a magnetic current which surrounds the wire and behaviours in the exactly the same way as capacitance.

    Because people do not use the concept of magnetic current they fail to see reactance is exactly the same as capacitance. We also see how the masing effect works in a capacitance reactance/ inductance form as we look at the cavity which is formed by the geometric construction of the coil. See how measured voltage does not necessarily cause measured current or how voltage may precee or lag behind current. These experiments show the importance of frequency as well as amplitude in producing so-called electric current effects.

    Capacitors and inductors both create frequency dependent masing effects. Capacitors inductors and batteries all store magnetic current and release it through an alteration of the impedance at junctions. This alteration is frequently dependent.

    It helps to be critical and skeptical, but that is not enough . You have to doubt your on certainty and start from the fundamental primitives all the time. What is a Watt? What is power? What is energy? Who is trying to convince you of what?
  • edited February 13

    The " cause" of the magnetic structure around stars nd planets is a turbulent pama. This addresses a structural form not an ontological development of magnetic behaviour, as we start with magnetic materials and change the measured distribution of the magnetic double layers.

    Magnetic double layers deserve to be set as fundamental primitives to all theory of Fotce and allied to the fundamental notion of pressure, utilising a Bscovich description of the theory of force.

    Here we see how the PMH creates a magnetic current in materiality. In this instance the intense local field creates plasma in a gas filled tube which circulates in the tube , confined by the impedance in the tube walls. Similarly the impedance in the iron core retains the circulating magnetic current as well as drawing in mor of the inducing force.

    The double aligned coil serve to Mase the current into a coherent circulation .

    Here we see how the ozone p,asma follows the secondary and tend to peak at where the primary and secondary cross. The magnetic current , expressed as a voltage at these points is differential enough to turn some of the air into plasma. . The flow of the plasma is not illustrated, but from sun observations I would expect it to follow the magnetic current observing the double layer/ Bloch wall distinctions. And the characteristic cavity conditions for MASING , between the primary and secondary wires, the open secondary forms a sinuous cavity in which we should expect a coherent standing magnetic current oscillation to occur, hence " charge" sparking.
  • :) now this video was pretty twisted! :D :D :dizzy:
  • edited February 13
    Gardener said:

    :) now this video was pretty twisted! :D :D

    Glad it did not make you recoil! :lol:

  • Jehovajah said:

    Gardener said:

    :) now this video was pretty twisted! :D :D

    Glad it did not make you recoil! :lol:
    Heh :) that was a good one!
  • edited February 15

    The coils whatever geometry wave guide magnetic current. Magnetic current is a fluid that flows around and through all materials, with a characteristic impedance. But it expands and contracts dependent on geometry.
    There is no current in a wire( Ivor Catt) . Instead the magnetic current flows around the wire or conductor/ inductor. However the magnetic current permeates materiality, and all materiality is susceptible to varying degrees. .iron, nickel and cobalt for example are highly permeable. They exhibit a magnetic current behaviour at frequencies not taken into consideration until transformer design showed its relevance. But because of the blinkered electron current flow notion, the patently obvious magnetic current alternating cycle behaviour was idelibed.

    Radiant energy , electric fields, potential, all refer to the magnetic current dynamic in materiality. .

    Ground / short circuiting a magnetic current causes the frequncy to apparently disappear, because the impedance to most frequencies drops to almost zero to ground, but to extremely large on the return path, usually through a tiny junction , which can consequently vaporise .

    The human body as a conductor /inductor is to be expected due to all the magnetolytic/ electrolytic elixir fluids within it!
    When Galvano found frog legs jumping it was because of what was called animal magnetism, considered as a 2 fluid structure upon a neutral materiality. . We now know there is no neutral materiality, just a neutral equilibrium between the magnetic double layers.

    The signals that return via the human body fluids are at a range of frequencies that increase the dynamics of the magnetic current , and a lot more understanding should be gathered from the Qi masters about how certain humans and animals can cultivate these dynamics from the universal m/ cosmic magnetic current.

    Magnetic current is not split according to the electromagnetic field theories because that is one aspect of magnetic current fluid behaviour.

    Magnetic current if course influence the plasma in the p,asma ball, but certain conditions have to be met, not the least the establishment of a magnet double layer around the p,asma , a coherent plasma beam of a narrow frequency range within the magnetic double layers frequency range as well as the strength or amp,itude of the magnetic field oscillation. The position of the Bloch wall is important to maximise this influence,
  • The Daniel Nunex abha coil design has been combined with the original Rodin Coil , to form a complex system. However the abha coil is like a closed PMH and the doubling circuit is like the 2 coils on the PMH. That design of 2 wrappings would advance the PMH design , but with the iron core what would it produce in terms of induced power?

    For me Magnetic current has been established as a better paradigm than electron current flow
  • If you accept the closed circuit or circular loop as a dipole , then arranging magnetic current to flow in these loops wii naturally support these dipole structures constructively or destructively . Any susceptible Plasmas will be guided by these currents depending on permeability paramagnetism and diamagnetism. Some pampas and materials are ferromagnetic and that will enhance the magnetic power in that material region structuring materials accordingly

  • Note how Faraday proposes universal magnetic power
  • edited March 10

    When you use a current loop( presumably electron/ positron/ proton currents) as a dipole, you then use action at a distance. Based on the gravitational/ electrostatic / magneto static inverse square laws. . Thus along a ray/ radius the force varies by an inverse square.

    However if one uses curvilineal force vectors that project a centre of curvature , then the forces are in a concentric pattern in a uniform equilibriate system, the force field is in solid body motion. However that is the simplest trochoidal state. The patterning is not concentric but trochoidal in general. Thus the volume around the projected centre may in fact act as an implosive or explosive medium or as one in harmonic oscillation simple or otherwise.

    The formulas that quantise the magnetic induction force in a region do not reveal a hidden reality, rather they record a measured quantity as a displacement and a velocity and acceleration.

    A curvilineal force vector therefore depicts the acceleration, from which we derive velocity over an interval of time , and from the velocity a displacement over an I terval of time.

    Clearly these quantities can be mimicked by impulse forces , but where do such forces arise from?
    In the case of a continuos curvilineal force these impulses are inherent in a model of such a smooth acceleration . But as the frequency of the interacting smooth curvilineal forces changes the resultant trochoidal surfaces exhibit smooth or impulse contours. Both can guide materiality ( plasma or other fluids of varying viscosity) on less complex paths.
    Brownian motion is traditionally used to prove molecular kinematics, but equally they can prove trochoidally dynamic surfaces of high frequency interacting curvilineal forces.

    For most technology the simplest metric schemes will do , but for transistor chips etc a high quality trochoidal substrate is advisable, to understand the " electron" and hole behaviour and so called tunneling.

    The scanning electron microscope works using high frequency measurements of materiality , and exhibits a trochoidal surface snapshot, similarly an atomic force microscope uses thes frequency and amp,itude patterns to express a trochoidal surface.

    So the concept of radial action at a distance vectors is only one way of depicting these circular arc dynamics and trochoidal surfaces. The measurements are similar, but of course tangential planes should be used to capture measurements accurately.

    In fluid dynamics a cube is chosen as a fluid element for this reason, but in fact any volume with tangential surfaces to stream flow may be used. The rotational dynamic can be modelled better the nearer the element approximates a sphere.

  • The use of spheres belies the attendant rotational dynamic. . The assumption of a spiral is important to generalise the circular arc, but the resultant is a trochoidal pattern that is dynamic. Corpuscles of matter are a convenient model of regional impedance conditions , but generally the sphere is ignored as a contributor to dynamic patterns. The Boscovich model of the atom was ignored.

  • The use of spheres belies the attendant rotational dynamic. . The assumption of a spiral is important to generalise the circular arc, but the resultant is a trochoidal pattern that is dynamic. Corpuscles of matter are a convenient model of regional impedance conditions , but generally the sphere is ignored as a contributor to dynamic patterns. The Boscovich model of the atom was ignored.

    By using Terry Gintz Quasz factal generator app I will demonstrate how a trochoidally dynamic pattern of forces can sculpt a uniform aether/ materiality into patterns that are reminiscent of solid, liquid, gas and plasma states. Since these sculptures depend on patterned rotation I am able to ascribe a magnetic dipole dynamic to the formation of these patterns.
Sign In or Register to comment.